Probably B

Funny because the better company is doing the Xbone version.

Was that also the case with COD Ghosts, BF4, AC4...HELL, the multiplat sports/racers are said to look better/play smoother on PS4?  Bad/inexperienced developers.  Gotcha... :-/

I would say its more a the ps4 verison is worked on by peple who are used to porting games while the x1 verison was worked on by people who are used to making there own games

Porcupine_I said: Also:

Ha ha ha.

so, if xbox one is weak, what is ps4? average? damn the new gen is really shit if we talk about power, right? that's what i always thought, at least you also think like it!

and don't try to tell people that you know which company is better for a port of tomb raider because you don't know it. 

but nixxes made or helped with the ps3 and pc version so that it doesn't seem odd that nixxes has much more experience with this game.

http://www.nixxes.com/nixxes/projects/151-tomb-raider

nixxes had years of experience with the game before starting with the ps4 port, the other company started at 0. game would be probaby still not 60fps on xbox one but yeah, don't act as if you know that nixxes is worse to do that port. 

Guys just accept it, if Nixxes was making the xbone edition it would be 60fps and if united front was making ps4 version it would be 30.
Hardware has nothing to do with it. Dev experience can change things dramatically.

It have nothing to do with which company worked in the port.

Quite possible... would be strange to see it, but if a company is better around making ports it is expected that they can make it run better than the other... if we were talking about a new game then the roles would certainly be about how makes better games not with more fps or higher pixel counts.