Both PS4 and Xbox One use custom GPU and CPU. Cant compare them to pc hardware.
Both PS4 and Xbox One use custom GPU and CPU. Cant compare them to pc hardware.
Daisuke72 said:
|
I'm not debating that aspect at all. What I'm saying is with that PC would you be able to reach Ryse level of graphics on it (and assumably significantly better since the games will only get better as the gen goes on)? I'm asking this partly because I don't know and partly because I've never seen a PC game reach the fidelity that the 360 has with comparable specs.
| Vasto said: Microsoft is smart to upscale to 1080p. It gives their games a better frame rate and an overall crisp more defined look. |
Coming from a guy supposedly running a 7970GHZ?
ok
| Vasto said: Both PS4 and Xbox One use custom GPU and CPU. Cant compare them to pc hardware. |
Doesn't matter. They feature the same architectures as PCs so there won't be much of a difference in performance for a similarily spec'd PC.
Resolution matters I can totally see a significant difference on my tv between 720 and 1080. If you cannot tell the difference you need a better or bigger tv.
While it is true for a real gamer resolution should not be a deal breaker the fact is a smart consumer prefers the better deal. A system with higher performance for a $100 less and better versions of the same games makes sense to me.
If you want a XBONE buy it for Forza, Ryse or Dead Rising but if you are buying one right now for multi-plats then you are making a mistake,
yo_john117 said:
I'm not debating that aspect at all. What I'm saying is with that PC would you be able to reach Ryse level of graphics on it (and assumably significantly better since the games will only get better as the gen goes on)? I'm asking this partly because I don't know and partly because I've never seen a PC game reach the fidelity that the 360 has with comparable specs. |
Console optimization is a lie for the most part. Thing is if you had a 8800GT you could run Bioshock infinite on low, 720P and get 20 - 30 FPS and it will look comparable to its console counterparts, yes optimization does play a role in it all. But it doesn't suddenly turn a 7770 into a 7850. The less cutdown version of the PS3's GPU could run multiplatform games fine with a Core2Duo, 4GB RAM, with it's limited 512MB VRAM.
And yes, a 7850 could run Ryse at 900P @ 30FPS. EASILY. An overclocked 7850 could give you it at 60FPS
Daisuke72 said:
ok |
Yep, coming from a guy supposedly running a 7970GHZ
fatslob-:O said:
Doesn't matter. They feature the same architectures as PCs so there won't be much of a difference in performance for a similarily spec'd PC. |
Link?
Vasto said:
Link? |
They both use x86 and they both also use GCN so no excuses! What are you getting so defensive about exactly ? All of the consoles are weak compared to your 7970 ghz edition so I see no need to damage control for either of the consoles. What's more is that the AMD mantle will close the gap even further. What's even worse is that microsoft is going to use directX for the X1 so it will be even closer than before.
Daisuke72 said:
Console optimization is a lie for the most part. Thing is if you had a 8800GT you could run Bioshock infinite on low, 720P and get 20 - 30 FPS and it will look comparable to its console counterparts, yes optimization does play a role in it all. But it doesn't suddenly turn a 7770 into a 7850. The less cutdown version of the PS3's GPU could run multiplatform games fine with a Core2Duo, 4GB RAM, with it's limited 512MB VRAM.
And yes, a 7850 could run Ryse at 900P @ 30FPS. EASILY. An overclocked 7850 could give you it at 60FPS |
Well then, consider me educated! I had no idea (probably mostly because I haven't had all that much experience with PC gaming).