Roma said:
it's not possible in the sense that you can travel back and forth in it no |
Correct.
That's a very stringent definition of time travel not shared by any physicist.
Why we have not seen time travellers? | |||
| Time travel is impossible | 53 | 49.07% | |
| Time travellers are hidden among us | 29 | 26.85% | |
| The world ends before it is invented | 26 | 24.07% | |
| Total: | 108 | ||
Roma said:
it's not possible in the sense that you can travel back and forth in it no |
Correct.
That's a very stringent definition of time travel not shared by any physicist.

Jay z 1939 NYC
Steam/Origin ID: salorider
Nintendo Network ID: salorider
PSN: salorider
3DS Friend Code: 4983-4984-4179
/Images/1-banner.jpg)
Depends on your definition of time travel.
Theoretically, all time actually happens at the same time. We simply can't perceive it as such.
So if we were suddenly be able to perceive things this way, it's almost like time travel, as in the past you'd know what was going to happen in the future and vice versa... but since it all happens at once, you couldn't change it.
Oh and for the laughs....
http://www.omg-facts.com/Science/Stephen-Hawking-Once-Threw-A-Party-For-T/56478

Track down the prop car from Back to the Future and find out. If it works go back 5 years and tell me not to go with my future x girlfriend - that bitch.
Playstation = The Beast from the East

Sony + Nintendo = WIN! PS3 + PSV + PS4 + Wii U + 3DS
Lots of scientists say it's possible, but it requires an insanely high amount of energy or something like that. My average brain can't comprehend how it's possible though. I can see how going to the future could be possible, but going back doesn't make sense to me at all.
| A_C_E said: There is no such thing as time, its just a word made up by human beings. I guess people just want time travel to exist but without an actual component there is no rule, and everything in existence is governed by rule, meaning time travel does not exist because it has no rule. All space is governed by rule and you can't change that. You cannot make 2+2 = 6. You cannot make the frame of existence move backwards or speed it up. Time is not a physical being, you can't see it under a microscope, you can't affect it, you can't do anything with it because it is just a WORD. It does not exist even on molecular or atomic measures. The only way to manipulate something is to grasp it. How can you grasp something that doesn't exist? |
So you see time as being something more abstract, like a perception created by our minds.
My 3ds friendcode: 5413-0232-9676 (G-cyber)

If you consider the time it takes to travel then yes.
"Games are a trigger for adults to again become primitive, primal, as a way of thinking and remembering. An adult is a child who has more ethics and morals, that's all. When I am a child, creating, I am not creating a game. I am in the game. The game is not for children, it is for me. It is for an adult who still has a character of a child."
Shigeru Miyamoto
Not possible because time is an instant expression of everything, we just don't see it that we because we are stuck in materiality and thus time appears an illusion to us.
So while it's not possible to travel in time per se, it is possible to view past events like pressing rewind on a vhs tape or dvd. Theoretically, a machine could be built which taps into the akasha, the hall of records, or the universal subconscious as it is also called.
Licence said:
Well, presumably you mean travelling backwards in time. Travelling forward it time is possible - we are doing it even right now (it took me a few seconds to write this reply, during which I travelled forward it time by that amount). Modern physics tells us that we can even travel forward in time at different rates (look up the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox). On the sub-atomic level, things get interesting. According to Feynman's quantum mechanics, anti-matter (which we have observed and can even create and store) is physically identical to normal matter travelling backwards in time. Whether it actually *is* normal matter travelling backwards in time is of course a good question. What quantum mechanics tells us is that if time travel backwards in time is possible, it would probably be different from the "Back to the Future" type time travel where you get into some device and exit at some point in the past. It would be more similar to that movie "The curious case of Benjamin Button", where you would meet someone who seems to grow younger and lose knowlegde as time goes by. |
I have read up on relativity and time dialation and I try to picture what this would look like to an observer outside of our universe (hypothetical situation of course). To me an observer outside of our universe would be watching this happen like a roll of movie film with each frame unwinding at the speed of light (each frame being a frame of reference). Correct me if I am wrong.
My 3ds friendcode: 5413-0232-9676 (G-cyber)

Viper1 said:
You're still missing what I noted in my final paragraph. Having the coordinates alone is simply not good enough. You'd also need to travel to that new location immediately. That kind of immediate travel would require a form of worm hole. So we don't just need the ability to travel in time but the ability to generate a worm hole at will and between any two points. To really compolicate this, you'd have to generate the receiving end of the worm hole in the new time period. Let's really look at this. You need to begin a time travelling session. Then you open a moving worm hole entrance (it must be in perfect sync with Earths own vector or it would immediately get left behind). Now you generate the receiving end worm hole in that new period all moving at the same vector of the receiving end. If your calculations are off even by even a plancks length, you're dead. Travel 1 year into the future or past and you'll need to offset your wormhold location by 7.2 billion miles and the receiving wormhole must be moving in sync with Earth at ~820,000 miles per hour with perfect rotation to the axis, sun, galaxy, etc... Want to travel 1,000 years into the past, 7.2 trillion miles of displacement from origin. To say nothing of the fluctations in the vectors as affected by trillions of gravitational sources plus the rate of universal expansion caused by dark matter. And ALL frames of reference are also moving so you'd have nothing to calculate your new location against. |
I understand what you are saying destruction of the earth was not my concern.
But as you explained it there I keep picturing in my head my analogy of someone outside our universe observing it. As I said in another post it would be like watching a roll of movie film with each frame unwinding at the speed of light (each frame being a frame of reference). From your explanation and conventional science it would certainly seem like the expansion of the universe and time are one and the same like my movie film analogy.
My 3ds friendcode: 5413-0232-9676 (G-cyber)
