Hey, uh, not sure if things have been fully calculated, but...

I think I should have three points instead of two. I came within 2 points of Battlefield 4 (85 instead of an 83), 2 points of Assassin's Creed (86 instead of an 88) and 2 points of Pokemon (90 instead of an 88).

Thanks.

Pokemon X is at 87.

Ah. The OP said 88, so I assumed that was the score.

Damn, Battlefield is tanking on Metacritic hard.

So much for my skills as a video game review predictor.

Woah! I got 2 points! But I can't tell what game I got it from.

Now I'm only in the bottom ten instead of being second worst

hmmm... looks like I won't be getting anything for Knack and Killzone

Well thanks Knack and Killzone.

Actually, I wonder if any Sony game is going to give us points!

We're all doing horrible this year (which is why own terribleness doesn't show as much this year). I hope it's because game reviewers have finally stopped overinflating scores.

Perhaps but I think they've gone beyond that and are being a little harsh?

Whatever the case I expect XBO's line up to get more of a hammering than I initially expected. I guess that guy was right earlier, predict, and then subtract 7 lol.

Damn, looks like people were way too optimistic about the next gen launch titles. After looking at the first review scores I'd say subtracting about 5-10 points from the average predictions for next gen games seems like a realistic thing to do.

But I honestly find it funny that, after all these months of people arguing about which console has the better launch line up and after all the ridiculous hype some games have been getting, the games actually seem to be rather mediocre. This is launch people, there have been very few cases when a launch game has really been outstanding.