he said "not very"
which means it is somewhat accurate, but not very accurate.

 No way. Nintendo's are overrated.

I agree with this statement.

Whoa whoa.

First, this is indeed someone affilliated with Capcom. Second, he's almost certainly talking particularly about software sales, and probably mostly talking about current (not LTD) software sales. And even then, he just says that we're "not very" accurate. 

Which, unless Ioi wants to correct me, is about a spot on description. The December figures in particular for software figures were rather grossly off, with CoD4 alone being over 1 million undertracked.

Ioi's monthly hardware figures and particularly his LTD hardware figures are much more arcurate based on the occasional reports we get out of Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft.

And as always, Ioi is clearly putting in every effort to increase accuracy.  

Read the whole thread, folks.

 Metacritic scores of over 90

Nintendo               16

Capcom                   8

Sony                        1

Microsoft                  0 

Konami                   17

Electronic Arts        12 

Not the perfect way of sorting issues but better than nothing. Konami comes out on top.If any other developers comes into it let me know. 

No. In fact i refuse to read the post posted and instead will make a snap judgement that capcom and anyone who works at capcom or talks about them kindly can rot in a hole and die!

No seriously... the software sales stuff does need some work doesn't it? It's a lot harder to track.

It's still pretty damn close though. 

Actually he just said "not very" which could mean we are pretty accurate.

capcom are non-believers of vg-chartz

 No. Whenever someone says something is "not very accurate", they mean exactly that - it's not very accurate.

Meaning it's not all that accurate at all.

I don't care what kinds of spins you put on it, that is always the way it will be taken in the English language. Simple as that.