9.5/10 http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/932030.asp

 Just get Spiderman 2. I assume it's BC with the PS3.

Spiderman 3 seems to suck in every way imaginable on all systems. Even the movie is getting some poor reviews as compared to it's predecessors.

And is it just me, or do these shots from the Wii version remind anyone else of Superman 64?

Minus the fog of course but... damn it looks bad. 

Read that the DS version is actually quite good - IGN gave it a 8.1. How often is the DS version of a game better than the 360, PS3 & Wii versions? ;)

Rushing movie games out to make it in time for the release of the movie almost always makes for a terrible game.  TMNT was another recent example of that.  All the versions apparently have problems, but the Wii graphics are inexcusable.  I know they were on a short development cycle and the wiimote requires more time and resources than the other games which leaves less time for graphics but wow.  Early 360 games may have looked like Xbox games but at least they didn't look like PS1 games.  According to IGN depsite looking like an N64 game (sans fog) it can't even maintain a decent frame rate.

I would hope it sells terribly on all consoles and 3rd party devs learn they can't rush trash like this out the door.  But it won't, they'll make plenty of profit.  Maybe even more than if they took the time and money to release a good game later.  Capitalism is a cruel mistress at times.

@Shams

For TMNT the console, DS, and PSP versions all got 5.5-6/10 while the GBA version got an 8.5.  For all their gigahertz the Cell and Xenon couldn't match a 16.7MHz handheld. 

 LOTR games, King Kong PS2

It seems that DS version is a good one (made by vicarious visions) (8.1 ign)

 Yea its similar

I dont understand why the movie is getting bad reviews. I saw it last night it was awesome.  

Its unfortunate, I thought we were far beyond this "movie to game sucks" stage of gaming... but it looks like it is back. TMNT I think is a different story - and seems to be criticized due to poor gameplay decisions. Spiderman 3 has no excuse (except for insufficient dev time - and they were working from Spidey 2, right?). Treyarch (Spidey 2??) should have done the Wii/PS2 versions (based on existing engines), and another studio should have done the 360/PS3 versions. But again - if crappy gameplay decisions are made high up (i.e. by execs), nothing is going to save the game. Those Wii screenshots are disgusting - its obviously just a CRAP engine, or a really poorly designed game. I have never heard of a game losing textures (intentionally) for LODing purposes (not since the PS2).