MohammadBadir said:
Zekkyou said: Nintendo have too much money banked and are way too stubborn to stop making consoles :P Heck, the Gamecube sold 22 million vs the PS2's 158 million, and they still made another console, which actually went well. |
i don't think sales affected wether they made a new console or not, but profits did, and Nintendo made more money in the GC+GBA era(their least profitable era) than Sony did with the PS2(their most profitable era), so if they make more money than the competition, why not? :P
|
Can you give me a source for this claim they made more of the GBA + GC, because it doesn't seem likely. While the PS2 did have an initial hardware loss, it did sell (by VGC numbers, which won't be 100% accurate but I'm sure some quick googling will come up with similar numbers) 1.6 billion pieces of software, vs the 590 million of the GBA and CC combined. Seeing at the console maker gets 20% of each sale, that's an awful lot of game profits.
You also can't claim this is voided by the sales of Nintendo published games (publishers get 30%, so that would be a 50% total for Nintendo published games) as the total sales of Nintendo published games across both the GBA and GC was 195 million, vs 185 million from games published by SCE. 10 million at 50% is still a tiny dent compared to the extra 1 billion at 20%.
The fact we even have to add both the GBA and GC number together to compare it to the PS2, shows just how much of a flop the Gamecube was for Nintendo.
Edit: If it is somehow true, could someone explain to me how on earth they would pull that off :P