By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Evidence for the existence of God

Atheist pops in and waves (See avatar). The whole god thing always creates a massive response everytime it's brought up on here or gaymer. Live and let live. If everyone just had respect and tolerance for other people the world would be such a better place.



Around the Network
kazadoom said:
Psalms 14:1 "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good."

If you do not believe in God, then you are a fool. No sense in going on. Try to disprove His existence, try to disprove the Bible, I dare you, and not through some stupid comments on a website, do it yourself. Try to prove it is all bull, go ahead because you cannot. One day you will find out that it is true, I just pray that you find out before it is too late.

There is one God, and there is only one way to Him, His son Jesus Christ.

I personally do not care what you believe or what I believe because truth is not determine on what you and I believe, truth is truth wether you believe it or not. Do you really think that the God of this universe exists only if we believe He does, or does not because you do not believe He does, what a fool you are.

 No matter how much science proves Christians have the amazing ability to cover up their ears and say 'GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD'.

It is easily possible to disprove major parts of the old testament, the entire creation story has been ripped apart through at least four fields of science, biology (evolution is accepted as scientific fact), geology (everything about geology requires the earth to be far older than the bible allows), astronomy (once again the entire field of science proves that the universe is far older than the bible allows) and paleontology (which once again proves that creatures existed far before the bible says the universe existed) yet somehow creationists find it in themselves to ignore the science and stay convinced that the bible is an absolute truth.

I am not going to argue that god doesn't exist as there is no burden of proof on me to prove it doesn't, I can claim that an invisible pink unicorn lives in my garage and say 'Prove it doesn't, hah!, you can't! See!' but I cannot prove that it does exist, the burden of proof is on me.

I believe that the Christian god does not exist, not because I don't believe he does, but because none of the evidence points to it other than a 1500 year old book and a far older book both of which have large sections which have been proven to be completely wrong and a large portion of the rest of it smacks of fairy tales. 



kergeten said:
A subject of thought for everyone! What good has religion ever done exclusively ( meaning that it did before anyone else and despite everone else) and without outside influences. Hard to think huh?
Now what bad has religion ever done? Hmmm, sorry I don't have all night to write a post on that matter.

Won't anyone answer my questions?

Yes, I'm looking at you Kazadoom.



@kergeten, I'm an athiest and even I can recognize that religion does a lot of good for a lot of people. It provides hope and guidance in many people's lives when otherwise there might be none.

It's unfortunate that the extreme religious types who do harm in its name ruin it for everyone else.

The interesting scenario that comes up often when discussing religion is, if you knew categorically that there was no God, and you could prove it without a shadow of a doubt(just for arguments sake), would you tell everyone? Even as an athiest, I have to say I don't know if I would.



The only teeth strong enough to eat other teeth.

Also, something to consider: Man will make war and commit attrocities, whether in the name of religion or not, so simply taking religion away would not prevent man from doing horrible things............they'd simply find other excuses for doing so.



The only teeth strong enough to eat other teeth.

Around the Network

I look at it this way.

God is the universe and the universe is God.

He exists everywhere, everywhen, everyhow even in the dimensions we cannot percieve.

God knows everything, down to the tiny iota of matter/energy intimately.

Human understanding is limited to what we can percieve and concieve.

We have as much ability to truly understand God as an ant has of understanding New York City. Yes the ant can guess people are working (which he can relate to) but not all the ants in all the world in all of time could ever concieve of the political, economical, social, etc., etc. realities of New York.

Nor can all of mankind in the history of mankind ever truly grasp the enormity of what God is. You cannot fully percieve him, our level of perception is very limited. Nor can our brains fully concieve him, it's just too small.

But you can get to know Him. That's the beauty of it all.



 

cdude1034 said:
appolose said:
Zucas said:
I'll some up a counter arguement easily:

The idea of a god is purely manmade. Why? There is absolutely nothing in nature available to ever insinuate a god or powerful intelligent creature. This proves that the idea of a god or something like it is purely manmade as nothing in nature even suggests it. FACT.

How did the idea of a god or intelligent being come to life? Ignorance and arrogance. Man was arrogant in thinking that they were the superior creature. And if they couldn't understand the world then they used that ignorance to derive something unreal to explain it. All gods are mythology, and all gods are created. All are derived out of fear, ignorance, arrogance, and hope. None are derived from facts, and most importantly nature. God is man's ultimate creation.

Could not have God, or any transendant being, revealed Him/itself to man? That would certainly account for it. As for man creating God to explain the unknown, I don't think it plausible for any person, who not having anything to suggest within nature such an answer, to come up with an incorporeal and divine being as an explanation. I mean, who would have thought to themselves as they watched a thunderstorm "I'll bet there's a giant, transcendental divinity up there doing that". No. He's first and only thoughts would have been "It's the clouds".


What? Human kind for millenia have been attributing things they couldn't do themselves to divine beings. Every culture ever has had their own god(s) that had their own job(s). Far be it from me to prevent you from speaking for the rest of human kind though...


Yes, I know.  So? I've already said that that's possible by God revealing himself to man.  Are you objecting by the fact that the gods in various cultures are different, so it couldn't be the result of a single God?  In response, why would the revelation remain the same as it passed down and around by oral tradition thousands of times?  Look into any cultures' stories, you'll find quite a bit of variation there on a single subject.  And like I said, without knowing prior, how on earth would any person have been able to think of something nonphysical?



Okami

To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made.  I won't open my unworthy mouth.

Christian (+50).  Arminian(+20). AG adherent(+20). YEC(+20). Pre-tribulation Pre-milleniumist (+10).  Republican (+15) Capitalist (+15).  Pro-Nintendo (+5).  Misc. stances (+30).  TOTAL SCORE: 195
  http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=43870 <---- Fun theology quiz

@ SuperDave Well I was refering to something on a larger scale, and hope and guidance is offered first and foremost by society, and a secular one at that, the curch did none of that in the middle ages, rather it was pure fear and opression. as to your second post, I had an answer to that in another thread ,the bottom line was that despite religion being used for so much evil, it is still viewed as pure, incoruptable and unquestionable, and that is just wrong.



redspear said:
One day the man in Flatland is visited by a sphere. The sphere is a three-dimensional object just as we are, and it just so happens that it crosses Flatland right in the man's living room. Now if you will think about that for a moment, you will realize that for the man in Flatland a rather incredible thing has happened. A dot appears on the man's floor with no cause that the man in Flatland can understand. A dot in Flatland is matter! In figure 1, the man, himself, is made up of a series of dots. Just as a tennis ball dipped in paint and touched to a sheet of paper would produce a dot on the paper, so too has our dot which the man in Flatland calls matter appeared out of nothing (see figure 2). As the man in Flatland watches, the dot becomes a circle which continuously grows in size (see figure 3). You will see if a plane truncates (or slices) a sphere, it will produce a circle; and the deeper the sphere sinks into the plane, the larger the circle will become.

A lot of thought went into the OP and while it was fairly intelligent it was also very flawed. All matter contains information. The concept of microreversibility is based off of this. In fact information is limited by matter. the number of calculations that could be done per second by a computer is limited to its mass but we are far ways from even getting close to achieving that. The universe as a whole is impossible to fully catorgize since it would take the whole Universe to conatin the information. This does not prove the existence of god in any way. It only proves that the universe works this way the rest of the of the post is inductive reasoning it adds assumptions to meet the original proof.

The point of the article snipet from flatland is not to prove god exists either but to show that if god does exist we could never see the whole thing. If god were the sphere all you would every see is a dot or a circle. You would never be able to prove definitively it was a sphere(unless your name is euler) or just a growing circle.

To me God doesn't have to be proved since I don't think he could but I also do believe in god. I however can understand the veiwpoints of people who do not. I can understand that people do not see the neccesaty of an afterlife and I do not find it sad. In fact I do not even think it is a lonely thought. You live your life for your goals or the betterment fo others around you or however you want.

I think it is very important to be happy with the life you have and not spend your life chasing solely for the selfish reason of how people tellyou to get to heavan. Case in point I asked a nun once what if you are wrong and their is no god. She said well if I am wrong and there is no afterlife than I will never know and I am still happy with the life I have now. That to me is true faith. One that I respect.
I think redspear has made an epic win. It is even more epic for being so quiet and unassuming. "Humble", I believe, is the word.

Everyone who is rightly taking apart the OP and kazadoom needs to keep in mind that this is the true Christian faith. (Note: I am an agnostic ex-Christian.)

Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

kergeten said:
kergeten said:
A subject of thought for everyone! What good has religion ever done exclusively ( meaning that it did before anyone else and despite everone else) and without outside influences. Hard to think huh?
Now what bad has religion ever done? Hmmm, sorry I don't have all night to write a post on that matter.

Won't anyone answer my questions?

Yes, I'm looking at you Kazadoom.


Religion has done a ton of good even if you have an athiestic viewpoint it is possible ot see that. For starters it initially explained the unexplainable. To some extent it still does today. For example there are secluded tribes of people tha tlive in Indonesia during the time of the tsunami a few years ago they all ran to higher ground because there religion told them that when the world tree shook the water would come ashore and they would need to get away form it. In the old testement the rule not to eat pork was there because pork could make you sick(trichinosis) the rules about how to deal with people who were sick prevent people from catching comminicable diseases. it also put to rest people mind about questions that mankind has always asked why am I here or how did the world come about. It did so with a certainity to that satisfied most people and let them focus on the stuff they needed to do. Even the concept of go forth and multiply greatly encouraged agrarian cultures. there is a lot that religion has done right. However it is easy to overlook since a lot times religion is misused by power seeking people who don't really care or are egomaniacal because they think they are god's A list either way not good.