By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Splinter Cell Blacklist Performance Comparison – PS3/Xbox360/Wii U

ghost_of_fazz on 25 August 2013
zippy said:
Hope Ninjablade sees this, Wii U version outshines the others without breaking a sweat. Last gen tech my ass, even more impressive is its only a port from a different team, imagine what the devs could have done building it on the Wii U from scratch.


RED DEAD REDEMPTION!!!!

 

Also, people seem to ignore how heavy on the hardware is vertical synchronization. And considering the PS360 versions of the game tear 20% of their frames... Well, it's something.

But it's strange that the Wii U version has so long loading times, since it's Bluray drive is quite fast.



Around the Network
ethomaz on 25 August 2013

100 seconds of load time? Is that a joke?



Mohasus on 25 August 2013
ethomaz said:
100 seconds of load time? Is that a joke?


I was thinking the same thing (even 50s is a joke).

 

Thanks nVidia for giving me a code when I bought a new graphics card.



ethomaz on 25 August 2013

Mohasus said:

I was thinking the same thing (even 50s is a joke).

 

Thanks nVidia for giving me a code when I bought a new graphics card.

I agree... even 50s is a joke.

But what make the Wii U have twice the load time than PS360?



DieAppleDie on 25 August 2013

we all now wiiu is more powerful
this is just another poor piss port but at least it doesnt have screentearing which is incredibly annoying



Around the Network
RazorDragon on 26 August 2013

Wii U version looks much cleaner in those screenshots. Maybe PS3/360 versions are running sub-HD and Wii U version is at 720p? Certainly looks like it.



mii-gamer on 26 August 2013
think-man said:
Good! now that Nintendo got an awesome port which is superior to other consoles I wanna see it SELL!! no excuses this time.

Everyone who owns a WiiU needs to prove that if you are good to the Nintendo fanbase they will be good to you.


I have a feeling it is not going to sell well- buzz around the games isn't hight all. Plus in australia it is $10 more expensive than a normal wii u game, well in the ratailers that i have seen that stock the game. I see no reason why it should be that high. Unfortunate really, I plan to get it after i finish w101. 



curl-6 on 26 August 2013

I'm interested to see what Digital Foundry makes of it.
Honestly, since they demonstrated their laziness at launch, I never expected Ubisoft to make the kind of high quality Wii U port we got from Criterion and Frozenbyte.



ethomaz on 26 August 2013
RazorDragon said:
Wii U version looks much cleaner in those screenshots. Maybe PS3/360 versions are running sub-HD and Wii U version is at 720p? Certainly looks like it.

PS360 720p and WiiU 1080p.



ultima on 26 August 2013
ethomaz said:
RazorDragon said:
Wii U version looks much cleaner in those screenshots. Maybe PS3/360 versions are running sub-HD and Wii U version is at 720p? Certainly looks like it.

PS360 720p and WiiU 1080p.

How do you know this?

I agree with RazorDragon. Seems like a render resolution difference, albeit not a dramatic one.

The comparison is also kind of unfair to the X360 version. They definitely should've installed the texture pack.

But why is it a big deal that the Wii U version is the best (technically)? It'd be pretty damn sad if it weren't. In fact, it's already very sad that the loading times are so messed up, even relatively speaking.