Stop?  Did I start something?  You said a proper history right?  Smash Bros is known to have first party characters in their games which none of these characters are.  In some cases they have missed games on a nintendo console completely (Especially Sonic and Snake) and I wouldn't really call that a "Proper History."

And you can say Goku is not a video game character but then again Dragon Ball has over 80 games that has been made and 37 million copies sold.  Something that the majority of Smash Bros characters can't say.  Kind of sounds like a video game character to me.  That is like saying Batman Arkham Asylum is not a video game because batman appeared in comic books and movies as well.

Now I'm fine with you saying you don't like the idea of them being in the game or that people need to shutup about them, but to say 0% for characters without a "proper history" when Nintendo seems to be giving a few a little airtime themselves while also partnering with Capcom(EDIT: Namco Bandai) to make the new smash bros.

Don't tell me to stop either.  Just because you disagree with me does not mean that you should tell me to stop(Only made one comment).  I appreciate you using exclusive examples but my "opinion" on "proper history" has not changed.

MegaMan and Sonic are third party character's. It is only natural that they will miss release's on any console, but it all add's up to where the character/ franchise is prominently known and for both character's it's currently Nintendo consoles. Why do you think that Final Fantasy was regarded as a PlayStation franchise even though it come's from a third party developer? What about Tekken? Metal Gear? Why were these all these franchise's up to this point regarded as PlayStation franchises? because more than half their real support (there was still FF port's on GBA and tekken too) went to PlayStation. Nintendo has more waay more than half the exclusive game's from those 2 IP's. Can you say the same for AssAssincreed or Rayman? If you dont understand that then your just choosing not to. As for Goku and Batman, they are not video game character's. They were not born out of THIS industry. Do they appear in video games? yes, but are they video game characters? No. Using your knowledge your calling Micheal Jackson, Bugs Bunny,Shaq,ext video games characters. I didnt tell you to stop because I didnt your want opinion. I just dont believe you believe your own opinion.

I agree, Snake doesn't have a proper history on Nintendo consoles. He was added because Kojima and Sakurai are buddies and wanted Snake in the game. End of the story. Anyone trying to argue otherwise is delusional.

Agreed. Sonic was a special case, simply because people have always wanted to see Mario vs. Sonic.

But honestly, Snake had no business being in the game. Yes, he had two old (and by all accounts bad) ports on NES. But he's known for the MGS series, and even though the Twin Snakes remake did come out on GC, I still just felt like he never fit SB. The obvious Konami choice would/should have been Simon Belmont, with an awesome CV based background, and a bunch of awesome, classic game inspired CV music to boot. THAT would have fit, and been awesome.

Solid Snake? Meh. So when I see people say "Oh they should totally put Bayonetta in it, because Nintendo's HELLA publishing Bayonetta 2, so why not, she'd be awesome".......it's facepalm worthy. It truly is. It isn't just a matter of "has ONE of their games been on a Nintendo console ever". It's the principle of "do you belong/FIT in the Smash Bros. universe", just as much, if not more. Mega Man fits because his 6 original games were on NES, he was a huge part of NES history. The first 3 (and best 3) Mega Man X games were on SNES. The forgotten gem MMV was on Game Boy. Plenty of history there, AND he fits the universe, he fits in with the other cast of characters. 

The day that SB becomes a "hey, who else can we throw in here just to provide fan service?" franchise, and not, fundamentally at it's heart a celebration of Nintendo and it's consoles, is the day the series really goes down the shitter. I'm not denying that on some level, if it could ever happen, some kind of "Video Game All-Stars" crossover wouldn't be cool if done right. But Smash Bros. does not need to be, and should not be it.

My only point was that Nintendo has characters in Smash Bros that can be considered odd moves and now that Namco Bandai is working on it as well people will be asking for Namco Bandai characters like Goku.  Will it happen?  Very doubtful but it isnt going to stop people from asking for him.

I have a bias for Solid Snake and MG in general, so i was pumped he was in Brawl, that game had my 3 fav video game characters of all time in the same game. (Sonic, Luigi, Snake) but i still agree with everything you said. I didnt even use Snake, didnt like him in it and TBH i wouldnt be sad if he isnt in the next one, but he probably will be.

I actually doubt he'll be in the new game (which, goddamit, should have a real name, not just "For Wii U"). They only put him in, specifically, because Kojima "begged" them to. I would really, REALLY love to see them put Simon in, but I don't know about that either.