By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Which Of The Big 3 Has Done The Most For Gaming?

 

Which has done the most?

Nintendo 488 60.40%
 
Sony 219 27.10%
 
Microsoft 37 4.58%
 
See results 63 7.80%
 
Total:807
HikenNoAce said:
AnthonyW86 said:
MDMAlliance said:

However, that isn't correct either.  Saying the Playstation itself changed that image or that Sony was the reason that the image changed is incorrect.  Sony didn't make those games, Sony didn't make some "inherently more adult" console.  So no, that's wrong too.

edit: In fact, I believe the "kiddy" image that Nintendo has stems from their squeaky clean family friendly attitude rather than actually being for kids.  For real, Metroid was made before Sony entered the gaming market.  Do you think that game was made with little kids in mind?  It was fucking modeled after the Aliens movies.  It's also a Nintendo game.  It may not have been the most popular game, but that's definitely something that was viewed as more adult.  

There was also Mortal Kombat before PS.  And I do NOT think that the PS suddenly made older people play games.  I still believe it took time before the transition was made.  I don't think Sony was responsible for that change.  I think it became easier to go after adults as hardware improvements were made since games weren't as limited as they used to be.  I also checked your profile and you seem like you do gaming anywhere except Nintendo (though that is only by looking at your profile, can't say if it truly reflects your gaming habits).  

I said the Playstation as a system(and the games that were released for it) changed that image, that doesn't mean that it was Sony's plan to begin with. It did however happen thanks to Sony releasing that system. And the fact that matures games were released on NIntendo's platforms before doesn't change the image. Just check out how gaming consoles were portraited on tv, there was a huge shift in and after geneartion of the first Playstation.

You're a smart one.

Seriously, people need to stop revising history. During the NES/SNES era, console gaming was considered to be for kids. Arcades for nerds or geeks. Nowadays, you can hear anyone saying that they play games.

Yeah, but you forgot to mention they play casual Smartphone games. Introduced to the concept by many games on the Wii and the NDS. You need to stop to revision history.



Around the Network

Sony, but not only for the reasons in the original post.

Sony was a main reason to shift the gaming industry from Nintendo / Sega vision of what gaming should be. Gaming is now seen as a kind of media consumption rather than a "waste of time".



the-pi-guy said:
adriane23 said:
Nintendo. They saved the industry.

Side note: No SEGA love for the poll though? They can at least be an option even if they aren't console makers anymore.

If Sega was added, I think we'd also have to add Atari and Magnavox.  Magnavox created the first commercial video game system.  So pretty sure that counts for a lot.

Good point.



I am the Playstation Avenger.

   

KHlover said:
HikenNoAce said:
AnthonyW86 said:
MDMAlliance said:
 

However, that isn't correct either.  Saying the Playstation itself changed that image or that Sony was the reason that the image changed is incorrect.  Sony didn't make those games, Sony didn't make some "inherently more adult" console.  So no, that's wrong too.

edit: In fact, I believe the "kiddy" image that Nintendo has stems from their squeaky clean family friendly attitude rather than actually being for kids.  For real, Metroid was made before Sony entered the gaming market.  Do you think that game was made with little kids in mind?  It was fucking modeled after the Aliens movies.  It's also a Nintendo game.  It may not have been the most popular game, but that's definitely something that was viewed as more adult.  

There was also Mortal Kombat before PS.  And I do NOT think that the PS suddenly made older people play games.  I still believe it took time before the transition was made.  I don't think Sony was responsible for that change.  I think it became easier to go after adults as hardware improvements were made since games weren't as limited as they used to be.  I also checked your profile and you seem like you do gaming anywhere except Nintendo (though that is only by looking at your profile, can't say if it truly reflects your gaming habits).  

I said the Playstation as a system(and the games that were released for it) changed that image, that doesn't mean that it was Sony's plan to begin with. It did however happen thanks to Sony releasing that system. And the fact that matures games were released on NIntendo's platforms before doesn't change the image. Just check out how gaming consoles were portraited on tv, there was a huge shift in and after geneartion of the first Playstation.

You're a smart one.

Seriously, people need to stop revising history. During the NES/SNES era, console gaming was considered to be for kids. Arcades for nerds or geeks. Nowadays, you can hear anyone saying that they play games.

Yeah, but you forgot to mention they play casual Smartphone games. Introduced to the concept by many games on the Wii and the NDS. You need to stop to revision history.

You're confusing adult who are gamers at core with adults who are casual gamers and only play Angry Birds.



VXIII said:
Sony, but not only for the reasons in the original post.

Sony was a main reason to shift the gaming industry from Nintendo / Sega vision of what gaming should be. Gaming is now seen as a kind of media consumption rather than a "waste of time".

Gaming has always been, and will always be, a mixture of both.



WHERE IS MY KORORINPA 3

Around the Network
Weedlab said:
AndrewWK said:


ohh shit sorry sorry Of course I meant not like in "not a stupid fanboy"


No worries. I don't take things seriously here. And I interpreted it as a joke.


The funny thing is he made a double negative, so you weedlab are not not a stupid a fanboy :P

He insults you again!

@ AndrewWK No worries man! Weedlab knew what you meant! Also i like your sig, but I always have to quickly scroll through it when I am at work :P

OT: All three companies have done something for the industry but Nintendo obviously the most!



PSN ID: clemens-nl                                                                                                                

HikenNoAce said:
KHlover said:
HikenNoAce said:

You're a smart one.

Seriously, people need to stop revising history. During the NES/SNES era, console gaming was considered to be for kids. Arcades for nerds or geeks. Nowadays, you can hear anyone saying that they play games.

Yeah, but you forgot to mention they play casual Smartphone games. Introduced to the concept by many games on the Wii and the NDS. You need to stop to revision history.

You're confusing adult who are gamers at core with adults who are casual gamers and only play Angry Birds.

1 Billion+ smartphone users (With over 200 Million smartphone sales per quarter) vs 140 Million PS360 users. I think the "casual" smartphone gamers represent "anyone" better than the "hardcore" gamers.



VXIII said:
Sony, but not only for the reasons in the original post.

Sony was a main reason to shift the gaming industry from Nintendo / Sega vision of what gaming should be. Gaming is now seen as a kind of media consumption rather than a "waste of time".

I'm wondering if it really is Sony or not that was the main reason for the shift.  I honestly still hear many people say gaming is a waste of time.  I mean, at what point did people say it was a media consumption?  I would believe it was after the 16 bit era.  I'm not 100% sure, I'm just skeptical. 



HikenNoAce said:

You're a smart one.

Seriously, people need to stop revising history. During the NES/SNES era, console gaming was considered to be for kids. Arcades for nerds or geeks. Nowadays, you can hear anyone saying that they play games.

You seem to be yapping on about that 'kid'-image Nintendo created.

Do you have any idea why that is? Any clue what happened for it to get that far? You should read up on some history yourself and start giving respect where respect is due.

Because I'm positive you won't actually read anything Nintendo related, here's a dumbed down lesson for you. Even if I'm probably just talking to a wall:

When third parties and Atari made so many low quality and bad games for the Atari 2600 that the industry collapsed because consumers were fed up, retailers did not want to stock anymore video-games or video-game related stuff on their store-shelves. A big problem for Nintendo, who saw an opportunity to expand into a rather large hole left by a lot of companies who left the industry altogether. Nintendo decided to take marketing of video-games into a different route. Instead of focussing on the 'nerdy' demographic or the tech-savy people like Atari and the other companies did during the what's now known as the 2nd generation of video-games, Nintendo came up with a way to market the new NES as a toy. Retailers were willing to sell something marketed as a toy. In a clever move, Nintendo created accessoiries to amplify that notion. Probably most famous, R.O.B. the robot. That's not a video-game, that's a toy with which you can play on your tv! Retailers would stock something like that. That's what saved the industry, that's why Nintendo got a 'kiddy'-image and more importantly, that's why you are able to play on your PlayStation today. A marketing technique that was born out of utter necessity.



KHlover said:
HikenNoAce said:
KHlover said:
HikenNoAce said:
 

You're a smart one.

Seriously, people need to stop revising history. During the NES/SNES era, console gaming was considered to be for kids. Arcades for nerds or geeks. Nowadays, you can hear anyone saying that they play games.

Yeah, but you forgot to mention they play casual Smartphone games. Introduced to the concept by many games on the Wii and the NDS. You need to stop to revision history.

You're confusing adult who are gamers at core with adults who are casual gamers and only play Angry Birds.

1 Billion+ smartphone users (With over 200 Million smartphone sales per quarter) vs 140 Million PS360 users. I think the "casual" smartphone gamers represent "anyone" better than the "hardcore" gamers.


Represent "anyone"? How can they represent a category that they're not part of?