By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 58: Avatar The Last Airbender

benao87 on 11 August 2013

UHmm, spurge voting is suspicious, as is the whole accusation from Stefl. Spurge claims on nacho are very weird, and now just the vote against stefl shows desperation, which could mean that he is being cornered and he has something to hide.

Stefl on the other had, even though he apparently has found something, he started focusing on spurge for very little.

The problem with spurge is that he is a random player, and when I've been more suspicious of him, he was town. Only once, I've seen him being scum and that time he was rather absent. I don't know if I'd be ok with lynching spurge, but day one we won't get much more information.



Complete comic

Around the Network
Stefl1504 on 11 August 2013
spurgeonryan said:
Stefl is back to his scum self. After hiding for a while after his first outburst it is back. Either Nacho or himself is scum, or both.

How was I afraid a mislynch was not going to happen? You were leading the pack! The FUCK you talking about. If people agree with you they are most likely scum as well.

Since I am vote happy...unvote
Vote: Stefl

You are the one rambling making no sense. If you all remember, even though I voted Nacho, I still highly suspected Stefl. Why would I leave him if I was afraid of a mislynch? He was leading the pack!

In regards to your inquiry that I should answer your question... let me answer this with: I never said you were afraid of it not to happen.

You just deemed it less likely to happen, thus you moved on.

Scum doesn't care who to mislynch as long as a mislynch happens (in earlygame that is).



Currently Streaming: Tales of Xillia & Best Doto - My DotA 2 stats

AstroGamer on 11 August 2013

Vote:Stefl
day 1 is going one for way too long and no one is getting anything done aside from a Spurge and Stefl arguing. I feel Stefl's death would be best regardless of his alignment as he tends to throw people off in games he plays.



My Hummingbird

3DS Friend Code: 047387541842

supermario128 on 11 August 2013

Voting to lynch (It takes 7 votes):

Player L-6 L-5 L-4 L-3 L-2 L-1 Lynched!
Spurge Noctis Stefl    


Linkz Nacho





Stefl FF Vetteman
 Spurge
 Astro


 

Voting for time limit (It takes 5 votes):

L-4 L-3 L-2 L-1 In place!
Astro Moreno
 Benao

--------------------------------------

Noctis: Spurge
Stefl: Spurge
Astro: Time Limit, Stefl
Nacho: Linkz
Vetteman: Time Limit, Stefl
Moreno: Time Limit
Benao: Time Limit
FF: Stefl
Spurge: Stefl, Nacho, Stefl




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

Linkzmax on 11 August 2013
Yoshiya said:
spurgeonryan said:
Unvote
Vote: Nacho

He agrees with me, and he is lurking, and he goes after linkz. He knows that linkz is one that you want to get out of the game early on. Plus no one is voting him or mad that he has not shown up. Dismayed, but not mad.

Just thinking about this vote again it seems kind of weird. It seems to be simultaneously defending Linkz (heavily indirectly in the sense that he thinks taking Linkz out first round is a scum tell) and voting a lurker. Considering that his previous posts are effectively defending Nacho's lurking (to an extent) due to his lack of activity on this site, it seems weird to then go after him instead of say Baalz who he has previously explained should be lurking less.

Are you implying that spurge is buddying up to me or that we are scummates?



VGC Mafia Archives

Around the Network
Yoshiya on 12 August 2013
Linkzmax said:
Yoshiya said:
spurgeonryan said:
Unvote
Vote: Nacho

He agrees with me, and he is lurking, and he goes after linkz. He knows that linkz is one that you want to get out of the game early on. Plus no one is voting him or mad that he has not shown up. Dismayed, but not mad.

Just thinking about this vote again it seems kind of weird. It seems to be simultaneously defending Linkz (heavily indirectly in the sense that he thinks taking Linkz out first round is a scum tell) and voting a lurker. Considering that his previous posts are effectively defending Nacho's lurking (to an extent) due to his lack of activity on this site, it seems weird to then go after him instead of say Baalz who he has previously explained should be lurking less.

Are you implying that spurge is buddying up to me or that we are scummates?

Could be either although the latter is more likely considering how loose the defence was. That said, I don't actually think you are scum atm, it was more just something I noticed and I wanted to make sure I got it out there rather than letting the thought vanish in case something similar came up later on so I would thus have other evidence back down the line. The second half of the post (about voting Nacho who was a lurker) is by far the more important part of that in my opinion.



Yoshiya on 12 August 2013
spurgeonryan said:

Nacho had nothing. Where was I going with such a vote? I am weary of people agreeing with me. Just look at how this game has gone so far. No one agreeing with me, I am too random, not making any sense, yet Nacho seems ...when he was here...keen on agreeing with me with that post?

I still don't quite understand this vote. You went after Nacho because he agreed with you but your main suspect is someone that is disagreeing with you vehemently. I know you're often not consistent but even that seems a bit extreme.



Vetteman94 on 12 August 2013

Unvote

Vote: Spurge

At first I thought you were just being slightly erratic,  but now you don't make any sense.   

Vote: Time Limit   



Vetteman94 on 12 August 2013
spurgeonryan said:
Lol^ what are you talking about vettman?

If you do not know. Nobody ever agrees with me. Nacho has a history of also not agreeing with me. Stefl ,like most humans is different. When he disagrees it makes me ancctious. You would have to have played a lot of recent games to understand. Something these other yahoos should already.

Luckily I watched you closely last game vvettman, so I am sure your town.

Funny know one jumps on any other unvote/votes. Just mine. You guys are too much sometimes.

No one ever agrees with you yet the first person who does you vote for them?   You now claim its because he has a history of  not agreeing with you, despite that he did this game.  Maybe you jumped on him for agreeing with you because you know your reasoning is BS.  What reason have you given to everyone for agreeing with you?  And maybe you get anxious when Stefl disagrees with you because he knows how to figure out when you give BS reasoning.

Maybe others would take notice of the other unvotes/votes if they were for reasons that didnt make sense.   



Vetteman94 on 12 August 2013

Given that there are about 21 hours left in the first day, and 2 people leading the pack to be lynched, I think that a couple role claims could be in order.