JayWood2010 said:
GTAexpert said:
I'm sure most of the games you guys are listing will be made even wihout moneyhats. That's why I'm saying it shouldn't happen. If its a game like Scalebound I definitely am happy that MS is funding it but I am not happy that they did this with ROTTR which would have come to more platforms otherwise.
|
Ill say again, its a business, not a charity. Do you think Microsoft had the intentions of helping sony out when making a deal for Tomb Raider? Do you think Sony had the intentions to help MSFT when making a deal with Stree Fighter? Hell no. Its about giving incentive to buy their console. That is what ANY exclusive is. An incentive. Whether it be Naughty Dog, Rare, a third party, or whatever. Its all invcentives to buy their product and theyre certainly not trying to help out their competition. And as a consumer you have no right to tell a company that you dont support that they shouldnt do that. You either support them or you dont, but you certainly arent entitled. You want to be, then make your own company and publish the game yourself.
|
You're not getting it. The thing you stated is exactly the reason why I'm saying moneyhats should not happen. It goes for Sony as well. If you really want to compete, market you're console, increase and improve your first party output and bring features to your console. Making multiplats exclusive to your console only prevents others from playing them, it doesn't really increase your own output.
What I'm saying makes sense as a gamer, not as a businessman. I hope as a gamer you too agree, even if you wouldn't agree to this a businessman.