I know, but is still almost seven years older than Call of Duty: BO2. But quite honestly - almost all graphically good games of the last 10 years look better than Black Ops 2 on the lowest details^^

i like it if games are more colourful as the reality even when the game shows a real environment. as example forza has real tracks, cars and so on but it is often very colourful. i really like that. i think that's also what they want to achieve, to look like a video game even with great graphics showing the real world.

minecraft is so good because it is so bad. if the sand and so on wouldn't be only cubes and if you would really see how your shovel reduces the amount of sand on the ground physically correct it would be probably less successful haha.

Maybe it's just my low graphics standards, but... those are crappy graphics? O_o

Also, I agree with Curl-6. Best game of the generation, and it did not need mindblowing textures.

Depends on the game. Something like the original Ratchet & Clank is unplayable for me, but more because of the dated gameplay. I can play any other R&C game just fine, despite the old titles looking pretty old at this point. I also still enjoy Star Wars: Battlefront and KotOR, both of which look their age and yet are still fantastic games.

nintendo wii games always have poor textures i hate it tbh

seems to have horrible aliasing problems and that will look really bad in motion. 

Gameplay and story is more important for me. Graphics is the least concern. But its true graphics are also important.

But that's not the point. I'm asking if you would enjoy it better in 1080p or you'd leave it like it is now.

I don't get it, what's the joke? Are those all from some current gen console?

Best game I've played that came out in the past decade.

Second-best game I've played that came out within the past decade.