zero129 said:
You should give it a go. And how your not getting over 60FPS@4k is beyond me since im having no problem getting 50fps @1440P on a 3060ti. For me the game is running great so far and im happy, i have been waiting a long time for this game and the is no way am i going to let MS owning them get in the way of that, I have played all beth games at the start from morrowind. This for me is their most polished game to date without mods. The amount of choices is like Morrowind in space never mind oblivion. Yes it has bugs but nothing near what Beth games has have before. And yes mods are going to fix things players would like but isnt that how its always been with beth games and why us pc gamers love them?, since their engine is so open to modding?. For you i fully understand your opinion on this. But when it comes to Adonis just look at his comments in the starfield articles, and Chazor shouldnt be holding a grudge from a few down votes and trying to make it look like anyone who enjoys the game is an Ms fan or something. |
It's not so much that I am not getting it, it's more so that I am not getting it in the main cities. When I am out in space or in random planets, it runs well over 100fps but as soon as it gets to say New Atlantis, the drop is very noticeable and that's one of the main hub areas. I did say it in one of the past posts but I do prefer Starfields "optimization" over say Jedi and such with their stutter fests because while Starfield might not have DLSS and I am seeing drops at 4k, it's not enough to be a deal breaker unlike those other games. My rant was more so the issues with AMDs/Bethesdas handling of their sponsorship which likely lead to DLSS being missing and Nvidia GPUs under performing comparatively to their Radeon counterparts.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850