By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

zero129 said:
Conina said:

My buddy just told me that he has a 2230-SSD laying around, which we could use for the second Steam Deck... a 256 GB Samsung 981 M.2 2230.

Go for it, you already have an SSd from your buddy and all and well your learning in doing it will help someone like me who only plans on getting the 64gb model at some point xD.

Well... the "2230-SSD" of my friend turned out to be a 2242-SSD :((

I just ordered a 512 GB WD SN740, which should be compatible with the Steam Deck.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SteamDeck/comments/wbi82q/swapping_ssds_with_a_western_digital_sn740_faster/



Around the Network
Captain_Yuri said:

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Rumored To Be Slower Than RTX 3070 Ti, AD106 & AD107 GPUs Utilize PCIe x8 Interface

https://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4060-slower-than-rtx-3070-ti-ad106-ad107-gpu-pci-x8-interface-rumor/

As usual for post Turing, the lower you go, the less of a performance jump you get. On the bright side, least this will be more powerful than a ps5 regardless which will hopefully mean cheaper PCs.

CDPR Hints At a Full Cyberpunk 2077 Sequel

https://technclub.com/gaming/cdpr-hints-cyberpunk-2077-sequel/

I do hope this happens. I feel like Cyperpunk was a game where they were stretched too thin between supporting the last gen consoles and next gen consoles and pc. Hopefully with the next one, they will learn their lesson and focus on one generation instead of multiple. There is a great game underneath the bug filled mess that it originally shipped with and while the city won't be as lively as something out of GTA, the single player story is still worth playing through imo.

Yeah its disheartening that the lower tier buyers get screwed over. I guess Nvidia don't want another GTX 1060 in the market and a repeat of the Pascal series in terms of longevity. Saying that, its probably a larger jump in performance the X6XX tier than its been the past couple of gens. Though that's not saying much.

For CP2077 sequel, as someone who really enjoyed the game I welcome this. It got a lot of flack though the world was great as was the characters and was fun to play. And I agree, if it was fleshed out a little more and more and polished it would have been brought to better heights. But alas, bugs largely ruined its rep and and felt rushed/incomplete. Hoping we get flying cars this time and a proper cop/ai system with smart NPC's. And well a game that isn't broken out of the gate.

Last edited by hinch - on 11 September 2022

Captain_Yuri said:

Yea think of OW2 more like OW1.5. And yea, BP route is pretty lame. Ironically I liked their implementation of lootbox system because I knew they were gonna come up with something shittier. Least with the lootbox system, you would get the gameplay essentials like heroes and such for free + day 1 and only cosmetics are locked behind it. And lootboxes were easy to get and you could unlock specific skins and such if you had enough in-game currency from lootboxes. So if you were patient enough, you could eventually get the skins and such that you wanted assuming you didn't already get it from the lootboxes.

The BP system feels much shittier with needing to grind out to get the hero and obviously certain cosmetic skins and such most likely being completely locked behind a paywall. But my biggest question is what happens if you don't grind it out? I skipped OW1 for like 2-3 years cause I had OW fatigue. If I did that with OW2, am I gonna not be able to access the heroes at all? Personally it just feels shitty.

I think most of the AAA companies out there are mostly interested in using BP's and a paid for game to keep increasing or maintaining MAU's, and Blizz is definitely one of those companies that love MAU's over winning whatever they lost back.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Intel Price Hike To Affect Upcoming CPUs, Motherboard Chipsets & Other Components In Q4, Up To 20% Increase

https://wccftech.com/intel-price-hike-to-affect-cpus-motherboard-chipsets-in-q4-up-to-20-percent-increase/

The pricing battle will be interesting. If it ends up being 7700x about the same price as 13600k, then I think it will be an easy Ryzen recommendation for most people in terms of gaming. Cause having 8 big cores is better than having 6P cores and 8E cores in most gaming scenarios. We will see though.


GeForce RTX 3060 8GB and RTX 3060 Ti with GDDR6X memory to launch ‘end of October’

https://videocardz.com/newz/geforce-rtx-3060-8gb-and-rtx-3060-ti-with-gddr6x-memory-to-launch-end-of-october

Most likely aimed at internet cafes

Last edited by Jizz_Beard_thePirate - on 11 September 2022

                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Captain_Yuri said:

Intel Price Hike To Affect Upcoming CPUs, Motherboard Chipsets & Other Components In Q4, Up To 20% Increase

https://wccftech.com/intel-price-hike-to-affect-cpus-motherboard-chipsets-in-q4-up-to-20-percent-increase/

The pricing battle will be interesting. If it ends up being 7700x about the same price as 13600k, then I think it will be an easy Ryzen recommendation for most people in terms of gaming. Cause having 8 big cores is better than having 6P cores and 8E cores in most gaming scenarios. We will see though.

Intel wants to get the same money they made before despite the lower sales, that's why they're raising the prices.

And I'd say that the price increase is already happening. In several stores the Alder Lake processors are more expensive now than when they launched, at least both the 12600K and the 12700K.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Around the Network
JEMC said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Intel Price Hike To Affect Upcoming CPUs, Motherboard Chipsets & Other Components In Q4, Up To 20% Increase

https://wccftech.com/intel-price-hike-to-affect-cpus-motherboard-chipsets-in-q4-up-to-20-percent-increase/

The pricing battle will be interesting. If it ends up being 7700x about the same price as 13600k, then I think it will be an easy Ryzen recommendation for most people in terms of gaming. Cause having 8 big cores is better than having 6P cores and 8E cores in most gaming scenarios. We will see though.

Intel wants to get the same money they made before despite the lower sales, that's why they're raising the prices.

And I'd say that the price increase is already happening. In several stores the Alder Lake processors are more expensive now than when they launched, at least both the 12600K and the 12700K.

Almost feels like we finished off the Pascal era and headed towards the Turing era for CPUs where we are going to have a "new normal" pricing for products despite the jump not being as impressive as they used to be.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Rumor: Intel Arc GPU effectively cancelled: 'decision has been made'
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/88393/intel-arc-gpu-effectively-cancelled-decision-has-been-made/index.html
Well, here we are once again... and we have leaker Moore's Law is Dead reporting (once again, but this time with more meat, or should I say salt for the rumor mill) that Intel's desktop Arc GPU is so bad that, that Intel has canceled discrete Arc GPUs internally. MLID says it's not because Intel doesn't have the balls to hit the GPU market and compete against AMD and NVIDIA... but rather from a financial perspective (and I'm sure a lot more behind the scenes) they just can't do it.



Rhonin the wizard said:

Rumor: Intel Arc GPU effectively cancelled: 'decision has been made'
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/88393/intel-arc-gpu-effectively-cancelled-decision-has-been-made/index.html
Well, here we are once again... and we have leaker Moore's Law is Dead reporting (once again, but this time with more meat, or should I say salt for the rumor mill) that Intel's desktop Arc GPU is so bad that, that Intel has canceled discrete Arc GPUs internally. MLID says it's not because Intel doesn't have the balls to hit the GPU market and compete against AMD and NVIDIA... but rather from a financial perspective (and I'm sure a lot more behind the scenes) they just can't do it.

I wouldn't believe anything MLID says. That tard said A780 existed, Zen 4's IPC was like 25% and that Lovelace would get delayed till next year. None of which was true.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Captain_Yuri said:
JEMC said:

Intel wants to get the same money they made before despite the lower sales, that's why they're raising the prices.

And I'd say that the price increase is already happening. In several stores the Alder Lake processors are more expensive now than when they launched, at least both the 12600K and the 12700K.

Almost feels like we finished off the Pascal era and headed towards the Turing era for CPUs where we are going to have a "new normal" pricing for products despite the jump not being as impressive as they used to be.

Higher CPU prices, higher motherboard prices because the chipsets, made by Intel themselves, will also be more expensive, mid and lower end CPU being repurposed Alder Lake processors... Intel could have beaten AMD's Zen4 in all fronts, but it's like they are trying to sabotage their own efforts.

Rhonin the wizard said:

Rumor: Intel Arc GPU effectively cancelled: 'decision has been made'
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/88393/intel-arc-gpu-effectively-cancelled-decision-has-been-made/index.html
Well, here we are once again... and we have leaker Moore's Law is Dead reporting (once again, but this time with more meat, or should I say salt for the rumor mill) that Intel's desktop Arc GPU is so bad that, that Intel has canceled discrete Arc GPUs internally. MLID says it's not because Intel doesn't have the balls to hit the GPU market and compete against AMD and NVIDIA... but rather from a financial perspective (and I'm sure a lot more behind the scenes) they just can't do it.

I'd use a quite generous amount of salt coming from that source, but given how the remaining ARC GPUs to launch are the best Intel can do and that they'll be murdered by Nvidia and AMD in the next 3 months, I don't think it's unreasonable to think that Intel decided to scrap those cards and focus on the future ones.

After all, brand perception is also important, and the upcoming ada and RDNA3 would put ARC in such a bad position that it could damage Intel's brand even more than the driver/software problems of the ARC380.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.