KZ and BF!


Which FPS title(s) for PS4 will buy? | |||
| Killzone SF | 104 | 42.80% | |
| BattleField 4 | 19 | 7.82% | |
| COD: Ghosts | 7 | 2.88% | |
| Killzone and BF4 | 40 | 16.46% | |
| Killzone and COD:G | 8 | 3.29% | |
| BF4 and COD:G | 5 | 2.06% | |
| All 3 | 7 | 2.88% | |
| Man f**k those games | 53 | 21.81% | |
| Total: | 243 | ||
| teigaga said: Battlefield 4, it looks the most ambitious. The multiplayer of course looks insane. |
it's so open. Did you see the forrest demo. All those gadgets and the more open environments along with the obvious visuals make it seem a little more next gen in SP at least compared to COD and BF
It seems to me a number of people do not like FPS games (or at least the listed games). Interesting ... I wonder if it is burnout in the genre, a lack of interest in those particular titles or just no interest in FPS to begin with? Interesting ...

| teigaga said: Battlefield 4, it looks the most ambitious. The multiplayer of course looks insane. |
Uh, take away the sci-fi setting and it would be Rattlefield 4 or Gall of Duty: Roasts. I'm not trying to be a jerk, I'm just saying without the sci-fi setting it would just be a clone. To me Battlefield 4 looks like the same thing as Battlefield 3 but way prettier. KZ definitely doesn't look like KZ2 or 3. They are both next gen.
ShinmenTakezo said:
Uh, take away the sci-fi setting and it would be Rattlefield 4 or Gall of Duty: Roasts. I'm not trying to be a jerk, I'm just saying without the sci-fi setting it would just be a clone. To me Battlefield 4 looks like the same thing as Battlefield 3 but way prettier. KZ definitely doesn't look like KZ2 or 3. They are both next gen. |
The battlefield single player looks more compelling to me. From the story, characters, set pieces and visual, it juts looks far more engaging.
I'm a big sci fi guy but KZ looks like the typical sci-fi dressed shooter. As in there is very little sci fi in it besides the art design.
teigaga said:
The battlefield single player looks more compelling to me. From the story, characters, set pieces and visual, it juts looks far more engaging. |
I don't agree with you on KZ, but that is your opinion. I'm just confused because there is no doubt that Battlefield's sp is more of the same. Military shooters are a dime a dozen, but sci-fi shooters aren't as abundant.
Other than art and design, what else makes something sci-fi? Anything that is tech driven and isn't based in reality is sci-fi. KZ has intergalactic space wars, robots and plenty of other tech that doesn't exist. It is all sci-fi. It can't be anything else. I don't see how something can be dressed as sci-fi. Either it is sci-fi or it isn't. Now it might not be the type of sci-fi you enjoy, but it is sci-fi.