By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
teigaga said:
ShinmenTakezo said:
teigaga said:

Battlefield 4, it looks the most ambitious. The multiplayer of course looks insane.

Take away killzone's sci-fi setting and it looks very bland. Nothing next gen about it.

Uh, take away the sci-fi setting and it would be Rattlefield 4 or Gall of Duty: Roasts. I'm not trying to be a jerk, I'm just saying without the sci-fi setting it would just be a clone. To me Battlefield 4 looks like the same thing as Battlefield 3 but way prettier. KZ definitely doesn't look like KZ2 or 3. They are both next gen.

The battlefield single player looks more compelling to me. From the story, characters, set pieces and visual, it juts looks far more engaging.

I'm a big sci fi guy but KZ looks like the typical sci-fi dressed shooter. As in there is very little sci fi in it besides the art design. 

I don't agree with you on KZ, but that is your opinion. I'm just confused because there is no doubt that Battlefield's sp is more of the same. Military shooters are a dime a dozen, but sci-fi shooters aren't as abundant.

Other than art and design, what else makes something sci-fi? Anything that is tech driven and isn't based in reality is sci-fi. KZ has intergalactic space wars, robots and plenty of other tech that doesn't exist. It is all sci-fi. It can't be anything else. I don't see how something can be dressed as sci-fi. Either it is sci-fi or it isn't. Now it might not be the type of sci-fi you enjoy, but it is sci-fi.