It's the worse version in this graphics comparison! =P

Both versions look equally terrible

And this is the reason I find bickering over power to be petty and spending $200 more for a more powerful console to be impractical. What do you get for it all? ONE more polygon in the frame of the car next to the wheel?

My eyes aren't sharp enough to discern such an irrelevant difference in the middle of gameplay and they never will be. If the frame rate difference was 60 FPS vs 23, THEN I'd care.

Unfortunately, when I'm playing the gorgeous Mario Galaxy and then look at the stuttering of a lot of HD games like Mass Effect... I'd rather have Galaxy.

They both look better.
No, wait...

This pictures remind me why I refuse to buy any hd collections (apart from God of War). Graphics look terrible for a ps3 game (especially 4th pic. dude's head looks ridiculous). Either properly fix them or no thanks.

Speaking of SEGA, do you know what would make me buy a WIIU? VALKYRIA CHRONICLES 4.

Question... Why the Wii U version has a map on screen and the PS3 version does not? The idea is that the map on the Wii U version will be on the Gamepad... unless you are comparing a TV screenshot vs a Gamepad screen shot.

I think years of getting bad ports and inferior games really have made PS fans defensive...
I couldn't really care less about those details when I'm playing a game... As long as it plays how it is supposed to and don't affect the whole experience...

Finished game with full optimization versus unfinished game that is unoptimized port.

Current difference? Wii U currently has no AA applied.

Difference overall? When you need a damn digital magnifying glass to see the difference on a frozen screenshot, it doesn't matter one damn bit.

clearly the ps3,.. look how much he's slouching in the wiiU version.