g911turbo said:
|
I missed a "3", yes. But yes, I know about the technical details.
g911turbo said:
|
I missed a "3", yes. But yes, I know about the technical details.
walsufnir said:
"Why would you need ESRAM in a system with such high bandwidth?" Why do we still have caches? Because the path to ram is still slow. It depends on how you would use ESRAM (or EDRAM). It could function as a low-latency cache. The other part: Sony and MS were planning their consoles years ago. They had a goal to achieve, also performance-wise. They are, of course, both in talk with devs. So they had own and external requirements and knew how much power they had to achieve and built their systems accordingly. Now we have one system with GDDR5 and one with DDR3, that's it. There is nothing more to it and nothing less. Comparing raw data, GDDR5 has higher bandwidth but this doesn't mean the whole system is necessarily faster because we don't know the architectural changes MS did when designing NextBox.
|
I never said that GDDR5 ram would make the PS4 the faster system. If anything, it would probably make it the slowest one. That's the only advantage that DDR3 has, lower latency. Perfect for general purpose computing.
Seriously, people actually care about this? Who the hell cared about Dance Dance Revolution ram before these rumors came out?
I mean, when the Cell was introduced, the myths of its power translated into equal fan praise. But now this just seems pointless.
I'm calling BS on this one. None of the rumors have had in the past (from sources proven correct about their PS4 specs) have suggested MS having GDDR5 to begin with. It was DDR3 and ESRAM.
There is 1 of 2 possibilities here. This guy is full of shit and just wanted some attention. Or this guy is an insider, MS switched over to GDDR5 to match the PS4, and he is just saying this to make it look like this was the plan all along. I'm thinking the first, but the latter could explain why MS delayed their reveal. Of course, that was also explained by an insider saying MS was behind schedule on game development for the NeXbox.
lol if this were true, why would a Blizzard artist care about making MS look good by lying about when MS implemented 8GB GDDR5?
One thing is for sure, if both Sony and M use GDDR5 on their next gen systems, it is going to drive the market price of GDDR5 down in the longer run. Might see a slight spike in the short term as all allocation goes to those two!
g911turbo said: One thing is for sure, if both Sony and M use GDDR5 on their next gen systems, it is going to drive the market price of GDDR5 down in the longer run. Might see a slight spike in the short term as all allocation goes to those two! |
Eh, you do know that GDDR5 is currently used by a huge number of graphics card and that Sony and MS will not order hundreds of million of these chips?
Such a thing would explain why devs were so on Sony's ass to change. They wouldn't want there 3rd party games to be held back.
OHHHH!!!
what are you gonna say now Sony fans?!?
take this!!!
just joking xD