Yes please. I already have too many things hooked up to my TV and I don't mind a little extra cost for PS3 b/c just incase if ever my actual PS3 dies or breaks.
Would you pay more for a Backwards Compatible PS4? | |||
| Yes. I'd pay $100 or more extra | 76 | 27.74% | |
| Yes. I'd pay about $50 extra | 64 | 23.36% | |
| No. I want BC but would not pay more for it. | 52 | 18.98% | |
| No. I don't care about BC at all. | 82 | 29.93% | |
| Total: | 274 | ||
Yes please. I already have too many things hooked up to my TV and I don't mind a little extra cost for PS3 b/c just incase if ever my actual PS3 dies or breaks.
| walsufnir said: ...
My company did the connection for onlive in 2011 and our network-guru had to do a lot of fiddling so that gaming was "ok". Also, as it is given that you will have latency, I think some games are not really made for game-streaming, especially fast-paced ego-shooters. |
ah, gotcha. i'll agree that it would be concerning. all i can say is my test went really well. i played the rayman origins demo cause that's what i was playing on vita atm so it made for a good comparision. the resolution was slightly low, not enough to be "broken" but still noticable. i didn't notice any latency but at the time gaikai wasn't being stress tested with millions of gamers either.
i remember reading just after acquisition that gaikai was "gen 2" compared to onlive's "gen 1" technology. i didn't understand the details and it could have just been PR BS but i did try onlive previously with less impressive results than gaikai. anyhoo,. high hopes.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
