By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - 2013 full of PS3 exclusives

sales2099 on 10 April 2013
mutantclown said:
mutantclown said:
sales2099 said:
Sooooo PS3/Vita games are counted now? (looking at Sly and MLB)

Just saying 360/PC games have been bashed and swept under the rug for years, but now its okay when Sony bends the definition of an exclusive.

All in all im just glad were both on the same page now, that an exclusive just really means "not on the competition".


Stop your whining and trolling, what the fuck are you crying about? Sly and MLB are PS3 and SONY games. Good luck playing any of them on a non-Sony system. And MLB The Show 13 is quite different on PS3.


OT: OP is missing RAIN, Final Fantasy X/XII HD, Guacamelee, Dragon's Crown.

Underlined is also on Vita.....please read my other recent post.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Around the Network
naruball on 10 April 2013
Augen said:
naruball said:

Hm. So many awesome games, so little time (and money).

Does anyone know why Ni no Kuni refuses to drop in price? Even GOW, which is selling better at the moment and came out more recently can can be purchased for at least £9 less in the Uk (36 for nino and around 27 for GOW). Makes little sense to me.

Anyway, NIno, GOW, Beyond, Kingdom Hearts, and Puppeteer shall all be mine before the end of this year -_-


http://www.amazon.com/Ni-No-Kuni-Wrath-Playstation-3/dp/B007A7UJ4S/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1365604829&sr=8-1&keywords=ni+no+kuni

Dropped in price in North America, I'd say for for it at $60 so $40 is no brainer for me, amazing game.


It's still $56 in the UK... http://www.gamecrawler.co.uk/compare/ni-no-kuni---wrath-of-the-white-witch-ps3/B008LTGEGQ 



curl-6 on 10 April 2013
mutantclown said:
sales2099 said:
mutantclown said:
sales2099 said:
Sooooo PS3/Vita games are counted now? (looking at Sly and MLB)

Just saying 360/PC games have been bashed and swept under the rug for years, but now its okay when Sony bends the definition of an exclusive.

All in all im just glad were both on the same page now, that an exclusive just really means "not on the competition".


Stop your whining and trolling, what the fuck are you crying about? Sly and MLB are PS3 games.


This is a legit point, since this thread isn't even trying to make one, merely bragging.I thought it was pretty self explanatory.

Thread says "PS3 exclusives. An exclusive, as defined by PS3 fans since day 1, is only available on one platform, nothing else. Period.

Sly and MLB are PS3 games.......yes I noticed that, thank you. They are also on Vita. This by definition invalidates them, despite them also being on Sony hardware, it isnt a PS3 exclusive.Yet many PS3 gamers here and outside vgchartz still refer to these games, and last year still put games like Battle Royale, on PS3 lists, despite Vota having a version.

So my point is: Have PS3 fans changed the definition of an exclusive to a "PS3 game not on 360" and not "only on PS3"?


yeah, whatever. Buy a PS3 and play some games.

Whoa, great comeback. Guess you didn't have an actual counter-argument?



sales2099 on 10 April 2013
mutantclown said:
sales2099 said:
mutantclown said:
sales2099 said:
Sooooo PS3/Vita games are counted now? (looking at Sly and MLB)

Just saying 360/PC games have been bashed and swept under the rug for years, but now its okay when Sony bends the definition of an exclusive.

All in all im just glad were both on the same page now, that an exclusive just really means "not on the competition".


Stop your whining and trolling, what the fuck are you crying about? Sly and MLB are PS3 games.


This is a legit point, since this thread isn't even trying to make one, merely bragging.I thought it was pretty self explanatory.

Thread says "PS3 exclusives. An exclusive, as defined by PS3 fans since day 1, is only available on one platform, nothing else. Period.

Sly and MLB are PS3 games.......yes I noticed that, thank you. They are also on Vita. This by definition invalidates them, despite them also being on Sony hardware, it isnt a PS3 exclusive.Yet many PS3 gamers here and outside vgchartz still refer to these games, and last year still put games like Battle Royale, on PS3 lists, despite Vota having a version.

So my point is: Have PS3 fans changed the definition of an exclusive to a "PS3 game not on 360" and not "only on PS3"?


yeah, whatever. Buy a PS3 and play some games.

Wow....didn't expect to actually stump you. It really is a pickle from your position.

Heres the tricky part though, Sony has put you guys in a awkward position by bringing exclusives to the Vita, most recently the PS3/Vita game Guacamelee (88 on metacritic). If you go along with Sony and count these games as PS3 exclusives, you must then acknowledge games like Left 4 Dead 1/2, Alan Wake, Gears of War 1, etc. as 360 exclusives because it follows the same definition bending as counting a PS3/Vita game as a PS3 exclusive. But if you keep your old definition, then your forced to not acknowledge a growing number of exclusives that Sony puts on Vita. Your lists gets smaller and you can't talk up great games just because they no longer fit your definition of an exclusive.

This is a big issue to me, this ain't trolling. I would just like some clarity on where we all stand on what is now considered an exclusive. Is the term bended or not?



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Corey on 10 April 2013

Last of Us and Beyond look great.

I am interested to see if move is required for Until Dawn, they said they were considering DS3 support but if it's move only it's a no for me. I'm not buying a $50+ peripheral to use with one game.



Around the Network
pokoko on 10 April 2013
sales2099 said:
mutantclown said:
sales2099 said:
Sooooo PS3/Vita games are counted now? (looking at Sly and MLB)

Just saying 360/PC games have been bashed and swept under the rug for years, but now its okay when Sony bends the definition of an exclusive.

All in all im just glad were both on the same page now, that an exclusive just really means "not on the competition".


Stop your whining and trolling, what the fuck are you crying about? Sly and MLB are PS3 games.

This is a legit point, since this thread isn't even trying to make one, merely bragging.I thought it was pretty self explanatory.Thread says "PS3 exclusives". An exclusive, as defined by PS3 fans since day 1, is only available on one platform, nothing else. Period.

Sly and MLB are PS3 games.......yes I noticed that, thank you. They are also on Vita. This by definition invalidates them, despite them also being on Sony hardware, it isnt a PS3 exclusive.Yet many PS3 gamers here and outside vgchartz still refer to these games, and last year still put games like Battle Royale, on PS3 lists, despite Vita having a version.

So my point is: Have PS3 fans changed the definition of an exclusive to a "PS3 game not on 360" and not "only on PS3"?

Heres the tricky part though, Sony has put you guys in a awkward position by bringing exclusives to the Vita, most recently the PS3/Vita game Guacamelee (88 on metacritic). If you go along with Sony and count these games as PS3 exclusives, you must then acknowledge games like Left 4 Dead 1/2, Alan Wake, Gears of War 1, etc. as 360 exclusives because it follows the same definition bending as counting a PS3/Vita game as a PS3 exclusive. But if you keep your old definition, then your forced to not acknowledge a growing number of exclusives that Sony puts on Vita. Your lists gets smaller and you can't talk up great games just because they no longer fit your definition of an exclusive.

This is a big issue to me, this ain't trolling. I would just like some clarity on where we all stand on what is now considered an exclusive. Is the term bended or not?

You guys, Sales2099 is actually right this time.  We need to fix this.  From this point on, I say that any game that plays on Microsoft's home consoles AND handheld consoles should be counted as an Xbox exclusive.  Fair is fair.



Wright on 10 April 2013
pokoko said:
Wright said:
pokoko said:
Wright said:
arcane_chaos said:
didn't Deadly Premonition come out for the 360?...and wasn't it awful?


Nah, it's awesome. It got scores from 2/10 to 10/10. A love or hate game, actually, although the story is pretty great.

Let's be fair about that 10/10, though, as it came from Jim Sterling at Destructoid, who is a horrible reviewer, and is way, way above any other score.  I'm not saying it's not a good game, or a game some people won't enjoy quite a bit, just that perfect score for a game filled with problems is probably misleading.

On topic, The Last of Us tops my list, though the Puppeteer looks interesting.  Beyond also has my attention, though I want to see more of it.  Tales of Xillia I will get at some point and I'm excited for The Witch and the 100 Knights game.


I know, I was just using is as an example (And for the record, the Europe cover has the 10/10 from destructoid in the box art -_-").

No game deserves a 10/10 in my opinion. For the same matter, no game deserves a zero either.

Yeah, I agree with that.  I especially feel that way about games with obvious problems getting perfect scores.  I think it's incredibly misleading about what someone should expect from a 10/10.  Dragon Age: Orgins and Fallout 3/NV were some of my favorite games from this generation, yet they were full of bugs and problems and I would say the same thing if either of them were given maximum points.  I loved those games but I can completely understand any reductions they might receive.

Uh.  I just realized how off-topic that was.  Now NinPie is going to report me and it's all your fault!  Take responsibility!

On topic, I hope Rain ends up being a memorable game.  It's looking like a good year for PSN exclusives, as well.

 

Okay, okay, I'll take responsabilities e_e Anyway, Rain feels charming, the same as Puppeteer. I just hope that TLOU can live up to its hype and surpass limits. I hope well for Beyond too, as I like Quantic Dreams a lot.

 

curl-6 said:

Different strokes for different folks, my friend. ;)

I'm sure there are games I love that you wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole.

Nah. Or probably. I'm very open-minded with games in general, and I like trying every single one out there, even if they're pretty horrible. I have a thing for bad games too =P  But I agree with your first statement. I can understand why you didn't like Deadly Premonition too, I was just joking back there.



Turkish on 10 April 2013
Corey said:
Last of Us and Beyond look great.

I am interested to see if move is required for Until Dawn, they said they were considering DS3 support but if it's move only it's a no for me. I'm not buying a $50+ peripheral to use with one game.


I hope it has DS3 support...



Augen on 10 April 2013
Turkish said:

Not yet, there was a facebook page that needed likes so do that to bring Hatsune Miku to the west!

I was among 20K+ that liked that hoping come to pass.  They said the page was not hot air and genuine in monitoring interest.



Turkish on 10 April 2013
Augen said:
Turkish said:

Not yet, there was a facebook page that needed likes so do that to bring Hatsune Miku to the west!

I was among 20K+ that liked that hoping come to pass.  They said the page was not hot air and genuine in monitoring interest.


Over 20k? It has a chance. I mean it can easily sell 100-200k in the west.