|
Prometheus20911 said: Nintendo has enough money to be around for 40 years while losing a few hundred million a year. They are not going software only, at the very worst, handheld only for a while to amass billions upon billions. The 3DS is currently curb-stomping every other console in Japan, how is that not competing? The other two companies borrow ideas from Nintendo's hardware and their controllers are the most ergonomic in the business. The gamepad may be large, but it is comfortable as hell. They only depend on first party because that is what sells the best. Sony and MS 1st party games don't have the same pull that Nintendo franchises do, that's why they need 3rd parties. When they have first party exclusives that can literally carry the console, they won't need third parties. It's a smart investment because Nintendo profits, period. A company that has only posted 1 annual loss in its history is a very smart investment. One could argue they are the only ones in the "gaming industry." Their number one focus is games, plain and simple. Microsoft has been trying to be the media center in the living room from the beginning. It's why they entered the gaming console business. Sony is trying to combine the two and trying to fulfill their vendetta against Nintendo. Yamauchi was far worse for Nintendo than Iwata. He would cancel a project immediately if he saw one thing he didn't like. He would make 3rd parties basically beg to get the games on the system, and ensure that even if the game failed, Nintendo would turn a profit. He would dictate how many copies of the game 3rd parties were allowed to sell...it was absurd and he is the reason 3rd parties jumped ship when they could. Iwata brought the DS and the Wii, hardly stupid decisions considering how insanely profitable they both were. He has a massive uphill battle ahead of him following all the damage Yamauchi did. The Wii U has been out 4 months and is facing very similar problems to the 3DS, which has been completely turned around...expect the same. |
Now for my on topic response....
The Wii U will definitely survive for 5 years even if it barely sells more than the Gamecube. They supported that for 5 years, so there is no reason they wouldn't support the Wii U. They will likely profit from each Wii U sold by the end of the year, maybe even if they have a price cut in the fall. I could definitely see Nintendo providing a console/handheld hybrid, especially since they combined the two hardware divisions. The Wii U is most certainly a 5 year console while the PS4/720 are aiming for 8-10 minimum.
Nintendo's next hardware will likely be slightly better than either, if not hands down more powerful. The hybrid would be able to play games on the big screen and be able to save the games to the handheld to be taken anywhere, anytime. No need for a separate purchase of either the game or hardware, reasonable price tag, no data cap problems for internet streaming....seems very likely to me. If they were to utilize graphene....that would reduce costs dramatically, while exponentially improving power. I'm talking 100Tbps wireless transfer speeds, and able to be put on literally anything seeing as it is 1 atom thick, could be the next big thing in tech/gaming.








