By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - A lot of ignorance today (Remote play and Eyetoy never existed)

Turkish on 21 February 2013
J_Allard said:
Turkish said:
J_Allard said:
JazzB1987 said:
Turkish said:

I've seen some Nintendo and MS fans saying Sony copied the WiiU and Kinect, excuse me?

Sony already had Remote Play 6 years ago so in fact Nintendo copied this idea from Sony.

Sony already had Eyetoy 10 years ago, Microsoft copied Kinect idea from Sony.

Just ridicilous at what some people here claim.

Do you get paid by sony for all the "insert word" stuff you write all the time?  Just curious

Maybe he gets paid by word? His Gears of War 3 Metacritic user review was well over 30 words and of course a 0 score.


I get paid as much as you for writing that nonsense.

So you waste time writing fanboy reviews for games on Metacritic and don't get a penny for it. That's even sadder :(

"It doesn't matter what other type of camera existed before the Eyetoy or the GC GBA connectivity. The idea behind Kinect is the same as Eyetoy, you don't have to tell me how much more advanced Kinect is, the idea and concept are the same. The motion peripherals of the 90s were novelties that never became a success. Eyetoy was the first to be successful and found an audience with the casuals.
Could you stream your GC game to your GBA like with the PS3 and Vita? No. Its funny how Nintendo fans claim Sony stole the idea from WiiU, neglecting the fact it was done way earlier."

 

Funniest thing you have posted thus far in the thread. Paragraph 1 it's still "copying" because even though it's technically better and does more things, the "idea" is the same. Paragraph 2 it's not copying, because even though the "idea" is the same, it's technically better and does more things LOL.


Hey, atleast I waste my time writing reviews, you waste your time complaining about them.



Around the Network
J_Allard on 21 February 2013

You're confusing complaining with laughing.



happydolphin on 21 February 2013
Turkish said:

Hey, atleast I waste my time writing reviews, you waste your time complaining about them.

It's not funny though. It can be considered spam and trolling, and it really isn't appreciated and is unwelcome, here and on Metacritic.

You better straighten up because this place is getting bad fast with all the lack of sense that's going on around here.



Turkish on 21 February 2013
happydolphin said:
Turkish said:
happydolphin said:
Turkish said:
happydolphin said:
Turkish said:
It doesn't matter what other type of camera existed before the Eyetoy or the GC GBA connectivity. The idea behind Kinect is the same as Eyetoy, you don't have to tell me how much more advanced Kinect is, the idea and concept are the same. The motion peripherals of the 90s were novelties that never became a success. Eyetoy was the first to be successful and found an audience with the casuals.

Could you stream your GC game to your GBA like with the PS3 and Vita? No. Its funny how Nintendo fans claim Sony stole the idea from WiiU, neglecting the fact it was done way earlier.

Your double-standards are flaring. Could the Eyetoy perceive depth? NO.


Get this: the Kinect could be 4D in 4K with 120fps, it still doesn't change the fact that the concept of that style of gaming originated from the Eyetoy. Even the games reflect this, minigames, fitnessgames have all existed on it.

My God, I agree with you. And that's your double-standard, that though this in fact applies to the eye-toy, look at your reasoning against the GBA (IN BOLD)?

Do you think at all, like at all?


Stop being so vague and get to the point, are you saying you could play GC games on the GBA?

No, I'm saying that your argument against the Kinect is the same as your argument against the Vita-PS4 connectivity (both in bold now).

It's called a double-standard.

I'm kind of confused or my mind's fucked up a bit reading books all day, but the Vita-PS4 is not new, its been done on PS3. If I remember correctly, the GBA link cable, you could only use it as a controller to your gc, I had this cable from FF Crystal Chronicles. The Remote Play function lets you play your  whole game on the portable. :)



se7en7thre3 on 21 February 2013

Someone's never heard of the Sega Dreameye
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreameye
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5rw4yU1YPI



Around the Network
happydolphin on 21 February 2013
Turkish said:

I'm kind of confused or my mind's fucked up a bit reading books all day, but the Vita-PS4 is not new, its been done on PS3. If I remember correctly, the GBA link cable, you could only use it as a controller to your gc, I had this cable from FF Crystal Chronicles. The Remote Play function lets you play your  whole game on the portable. :)

Turkish, I understand what you're saying, it wasn't possible to remote play GC games on the GBA, much like the Eyetoy can't do 4K by the time Kinect 2 releases, like your hypothetical suggested.

So in one case you argue against the kinect, and in the other you argue for the Vita.

It's inconsistent.



Play4Fun on 21 February 2013
pezus said:
Play4Fun said:
Deyon said:
Play4Fun said:

So Nintendo copied Sony copying Nintendo.

Mind-blown.

Sony revolutionised it and paved the way for Nintendo. hehe


I don't know if you're serious or not, but you should now that the WiiU gamepad took a few years of planning and designing and wasn't thrown together after Sony showed the PSVita/PS3 remoteplay.

The same can be said about Move...

Move was clearly very influenced by Wiimote's success and design.



Turkish on 21 February 2013
happydolphin said:
Turkish said:

I'm kind of confused or my mind's fucked up a bit reading books all day, but the Vita-PS4 is not new, its been done on PS3. If I remember correctly, the GBA link cable, you could only use it as a controller to your gc, I had this cable from FF Crystal Chronicles. The Remote Play function lets you play your  whole game on the portable. :)

Turkish, I understand what you're saying, it wasn't possible to remote play GC games on the GBA, much like the Eyetoy can't do 4K by the time Kinect 2 releases, like your hypothetical suggested.

So in one case you argue against the kinect, and in the other you argue for the Vita.

It's inconsistent.

Dolphin mate I'll get back at ya when my head is clear lol



happydolphin on 21 February 2013
Turkish said:

Dolphin mate I'll get back at ya when my head is clear lol

Okay :)



J_Allard on 21 February 2013
se7en7thre3 said:
Someone's never heard of the Sega Dreameye
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreameye
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5rw4yU1YPI

no no no no these other camera and motion things are irrelevant because the Eyetoy had "success" and was way more advanced. Of course, lets ignore the facts that Kinect was way more successful than Eyetoy and way more advanced. It completely obliterates our argument so standby for backpedaling. It's still copying because the "idea" is the same.

Also, when comparing  PS4/Vita connectivity to things like the GBA/GCN connectivity, ignore everything I just said about the "ideas" being the same and lets focus on technical superiority.