VGKing said:
Cold-Flipper said:
None of your 3 points had much to do with what I said in my previous post though. I was simply saying that based off of past systems, Sony likes the powerful tech and high price strategy. Again, not really a bad thing just more risky. To say that Sony won't repeat the same "mistakes" again is being hopeful because I don't think Sony views them as mistakes.
|
High price compared to Nintendo systems which are sold cheap. and when they're not just look at Wii U as reference to what happens.
The truth is that Vita is an affordable handheld. It's not cheap, its not expensive, it is reasonably priced IMO. It's about time for a price cut though.
|
@B: Nintendo has nothing to do with this, expensive is expensive. If PS3 was $600 and Wii was $750, the PS3 wouldn't automatically be "cheap" would it? I find it a bit odd that you keep bringing up Nintendo when this conversation has nothing to do with them. This thread in general has nothing to do with our conversation but could you try to stay on topic to this off topic discussion? (HA)
@U: I respect your opinion but Vita IMO is high priced for a HH. $250 plus the memory card for the least expensive model. The PSP was even more expensive when you count inflation. I agree that Vita has a justifiable price for its tech but most people will see the price as a turn off. The lack of good games and high memory card price will seal the deal. Overall, games are the most important factor but Vita is still too expensive for the average person.