kain_kusanagi said:
Mazty said:
Just adding a poll to this thread and thought about a major logical flaw with that thinking.
The xbox wouldn't be any gen as it's not a successor. If you simply state "it has to be a successor" then that makes it impossible for new consoles to enter the market.
|
That's why only two questions matter:
1. Is it a follow up to a previous gen console?
2. Is it a considerable upgrade from the best of the last gen?
Just one of these makes defines next gen.
|
How though are you linking 1 & 2? They seem very far removed from one another. You're saying the PS4 could be technically inferior to the PS3, but a new console, say Console X made by Apple would have to be a considerable upgrade from the best of the last gen to be considered next gen.
I'd say that consoles simply need to adhere to point 2 otherwise it's just an off-shoot of the current gen, no different from things like Move, Eyetoy and Kinect.
curl-6 said: "Next gen" refers to the next iteration of hardware. Power isn't part of the equation. You're not in the same generation as your kids just because you're as tall as them. |
Thats a contradiction. How can you determine the next iteration of hardware if you are not looking at power?