From Neogaf:


Originally Posted by derFeef: View Post

Can the eSRAM buffer be sideloaded into the main memory?
Guess not.

aegies quote:

Let me see if this helps. For Durango:

Rendering into ESRAM: Yes.
Rendering into DRAM: Yes.
Texturing from ESRAM: Yes.
Texturing from DRAM: Yes.
Resolving into ESRAM: Yes.
Resolving into DRAM: Yes.

For the 360, that would be yes, no, no, yes, no, yes.

because it has 2x the cores and next=gen is far more GPU focused than CPU.

So, CPU clock means nothing? What if it was 8 core 3.0 GHz CPU?

Interesting you think this way....would you like to bet? I say no games on PSN will be 4k (upscale doesn't count), the game has to be rendered at 4k. 

It would consume too much power and produce too much heat for a console. Keep in mind that the CPU in the 360 was pretty inefficient clock for clock by today's standard, newer architecture helps. Clock speed is not the only factor.

From Neogaf:

Originally Posted by mugurumakensei: View Post

No matter what the special hardware does, it wont make up the difference in bandwidth and gpu power. In fact, a lot of this special hardware is stuff to make sure computational resources arent taken up bt kinect.

Orbis is simply much better than Durango in specs.

Reiko quote:

Nope. Not especially for Kinect. Dream a little bigger darling.


Originally Posted by Reiko: View Post

Nope. Not especially for Kinect. Dream a little bigger darling.

Proelite quote:

He is massively wrong.

4xMove engines have nothing to do with Kinect. They're straight up graphical performance enhancers.

When did I say it meant nothing? I said that they chose to downclock the CPU but double its cores with the reasoning that GPUs are far more important now.

Agreed. I hope the rumored "Infinity" name is true. Oh, wait...

I think Dodge should sue Microsoft.

.... and that's where I am not sure how to relate this info in my comparison thread. Same goes with the special sauce likely found in PS4 as well.