News networks report wrong things on breaking news pretty often.They corrected the info since then http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/18/us/connecticut-lanza-guns/index.html

Yeah the grand conspiracy of actors and officials is just nonsense but the conflicting reports of the weapons is what bothers me.

The only merit to 9/11 conspiracy stuff is the pentagon aspect. No video of a plane heading toward it or hitting it.

Why would there be someone randomly filming the pentagon the exact moment the plane hit? Why would they fake a pentagon attack when there were already attacks at the WTC that would justify a response?

The conflicting info about guns is bad early reporting, who knows who the federal sources were and what they actually knew when a news network is trying to get the fastest info and scoop to beat competitors they reach for any source they can even if it turns out to be wrong. CNN should have done a better job reporting.

There are tons of cameras around the pentagon. Not a one caught the "plane" only an explosion. Furthermore, where is the plane debris? 

You didn't address why we still have no info of the particular weapon used. Why was this information not released?

I am not sure how.  They may want to just drive traffic to the website.

Anyhow, I am getting close to a loss of words at the amount of inane stupidity I am seen fostered over the Internet.  We have the greatest communications and networking technological revolution in human history wih the Internet and BAM, have to get people coming up stuff that would of been confined to mental institutions before now.  Now the most outrageous gets covered and tips virally.  But enough about Kony.

http://www.redstate.com/2012/12/27/setting-the-record-straight-adam-lanza-did-use-the-bushmaster-ar-15/

That's from a pro gun, anti Obama site.

If the plane didn't crash into the Pentagon then what happened to Flight 77 and all its passengers? Did they just disappear forever coincidentally at the same time as the crash into the Pentagon? And again why fake a Pentagon attack when the WTC ws already attacked twice?

Yep, most actually. Columbine had plenty. You're kinda ignorant on the matter, probably shouldn't comment until you've done some research.

Annecdote: A student at my old high school had a heated argument with one of the school staff members in the morning. He came back in the afternoon with a gun. The staff member, who was in charge of the surveilance cameras at the time, saw him pacing around in the school near the back exit. He must not have remembered that the school had cameras by all the doors, because he pulled out the gun, cocked it, and proceded to walk down the hallway. The staff member alerted security and he was tackled and subdued until the police arrived police.

That person deserves a Klondike bar. That's intense. Most I ever had was bomb threats which never amounted to anything. I think people just called them in to avoid tests, swear it happened at least once a year in HS.

Why would there be someone randomly filming the pentagon the exact moment the plane hit? Why would they fake a pentagon attack when there were already attacks at the WTC that would justify a response?

The conflicting info about guns is bad early reporting, who knows who the federal sources were and what they actually knew when a news network is trying to get the fastest info and scoop to beat competitors they reach for any source they can even if it turns out to be wrong. CNN should have done a better job reporting.