| Soriku said: The multiple timeline theory is the best IMO. If you went back in time to save your leg, there'd be a split timeline where you lose your leg in one and keep it in the other. Though I'm not sure what timeline you'd end up in if you decided to go back to the future. Would you go back to the timeline where you lost your leg, and have a different version of you live with his leg just fine even if the version of you that went back in time still doesn't have his? Or would you cross over to the other timeline where you have your leg back, and in the other timeline there's a version of you without a leg? |
well fuck. I thought I was being unique in my answer.
ninja'd
I agree with the parallel universe/split timeline theory.
I am the black sheep
"of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson








