common sense would be stop getting angry, and to stop arguing when you know youre wrong :P
common sense would be stop getting angry, and to stop arguing when you know youre wrong :P
Dno--stop talking in absolutes
" it dropped the price TWICE in one year and xbox dropped once in 2 years and wii never yet ps3 sales have increased that is a fact. no one has said "o the ps3 dropped twice i dont want it" in fact people are buying it more"
yes people are still saying that, you yourself said that it has yet to reach a price the majority of people are comfortable with--so yeah some people have said , yes it droped 2x in price but i dont want it

| tk1989 said: common sense would be stop getting angry, and to stop arguing when you know youre wrong :P |
OFT--but since they are cracking down on spam i have to add this little part so its not considered spam

| mesoteto said: These are all response by Dno in regards to my point of the wii setting the price for the current gen "actually no its not because it has not dropped the price at all. wii is controlling the market not the price." "i dont think microsoft and sony are trying to be lower then the wii.... i think they are trying to hit mass market price..... why because 400-600 is a lot of cash. i think sony is trying to get to 299 faster then 360 NOT wii." "if wii is mass market price then my car was WAY OVER PRICED. i think (and i think everyone will aggree with me) we would all pay a little more for a ps3 then a wii because it does WAY more. If sony wanted to match nintedo then the ps3 would be 249.99 and they would lose on 150 bucks on each system sold and thats way less then they lost before in 2006 when the system dropped. obviously thats NOT their goal." so you keep switching and still unable to address why the wii did not set the price point for the current gen at 250 "the wii has something that cannot be stopped and sony has to lower the price to counter them" |
i never switched when did i switch? i said i do not think sony wants to match the wii in price thats what i said did i not..... do you read?
i always said the mass market price for everything is different and i do not think sony wants 250. i dont think im changing at all i think both of you are.
and im not mad in fact i enjoy a little debate but i dont agree with you two at all
Dno said:
right it doesnt account for everything but we are talking about the ps3 and if it drops the price again the sales will grow. we can disagree about this but at 400 its selling faster then 600 and thats the only proof i have. you are going on what you think will happen. i am not lol. it dropped the price TWICE in one year and xbox dropped once in 2 years and wii never yet ps3 sales have increased that is a fact. no one has said "o the ps3 dropped twice i dont want it" in fact people are buying it more. |
| mesoteto said: Dno--stop talking in absolutes " it dropped the price TWICE in one year and xbox dropped once in 2 years and wii never yet ps3 sales have increased that is a fact. no one has said "o the ps3 dropped twice i dont want it" in fact people are buying it more" yes people are still saying that, you yourself said that it has yet to reach a price the majority of people are comfortable with--so yeah some people have said , yes it droped 2x in price but i dont want it |
you are so close minded NO ONE CARES IF YOU DONT WANT IT. millions other did and thats why it is selling more then 360.
what i meant was people who dont want the ps3 will not get it at any price and people who do will never say "they dropped the price twice i am not getting it now".
one of you said that dropping the price looks bad and it hasnt because it has sold millions since that is what i am arguing. i want to see that sony looks bad by sales not but what you two think.
Your being close minded when you believe that everyone is willign to spend more money for extra features...
Its been selling mroe than the 360 for 1-2 months now, its not become a trend yet so you cannot really use that as a fact...
I never said that people will say "they dropped the price twice, im not getting it now"!
I never said dropping a price looks bad, thats stating a fact... It can look bad if done wrongly... which i have repeated soooo many times!
I hate it when people will not accept anyones opinions except their own, and take it for "fact". Im off to play MP3, cyas l8er.
tk1989 said:
|
well then you JUST said if another price drop people will wait no? well again i disagree because again (all i have to go on is facts) the ps3 sales did nuthin but go up and i cant say o it will drop after another price cut cause it wont.
if people start putting off there purchase then that is something that can be TRACKED(because sales would slow) therefore you are saying there will be proof and i want you to prove it because all drops proved otherwise.
There has been one price drop!!!! Thats not what my argument has eben about!!! omg!!! My argument is about if there was multiple (yes, more than one!!) price drops in a short period of time (not long periods, btu short period, say a couple of months)!!!!
You are basing your "facts" on one price drop!!! which is not what my argumnent is abotu! i have explained my argument many many times now, and everytime you ahve taken it the wrong way or twisted it. I cba explaining it all again for your sake, just because you have problems understanding what i have said.
| tk1989 said: Your being close minded when you believe that everyone is willign to spend more money for extra features... I hate it when people will not accept anyones opinions except their own, and take it for "fact". Im off to play MP3, cyas l8er. |
again i never said EVERYONE i said people meaning some will some wont. i did you didnt therefore there is a market for it and i will pay a little extra for more features. so will the 10 million on ps3 and 17 million on 360 who wants those features... now i no some dont but some do or they would have bought a wii and nuthin esle.