By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Gaming Tablet Wars? Sony Vita Tablet vs Xbox Surface

 

Would you buy a playstation Tablet/ Xbox Surface?

Yes 13 25.00%
 
No 18 34.62%
 
Maybe 7 13.46%
 
Show me dem results 14 26.92%
 
Total:52
KBG29 said:
Kynes said:
Chark said:
Kynes said:
Chark said:
The Vita has PlayStation Mobile which is an App store. It just launched so there aren't many titles but there is an expected 70 by Christmas and then they will start flooding in like mad. Android developers can easily port their apps over to PSM since they use the same code. The Vita has Netflix, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare, Google Maps, Email, a great web browser and more. Add in all of the apps it will be getting through PSM and you have yourself a tablet. Why don't people know this?


We know you love your vita, but please, stop the shilling. There are some phones with a bigger screen than the Vita, it can't be considered a tablet.

Shilling, what are you insinuating. Try adding to the conversation, don't just try and undermine what I say with your bias.

What's in a tablet? What counts now a days? With mini tablets can't it be one of those? "Tablets" should be considered more about what they do, how they function than the size of their screen. The Vita is a tablet, it is a touch screen mobile device with multiple computer-esque functions and apps.


Do you consider the ipod touch a tablet?


Why not? Tablets are just smart phones without the network chip in them. The bigger the tablet the more powerful, the smaller the opposite. 

I agree with others that Sony needs to make a vita with a network chip asap. In fact I have been saying that they should have a PSP phone since 2005. With the Xperia Play coming up on its 2 year anniversary, contract subscribers will be looking for something to upgrade to. Now is the perfect time. To make things even better there has been a major shift to phones with 5 and 6in screens. That would allow the Vita to fit right in. As chark has said, PSM has got apps covered, so they don't need android for these devices. Hell, I only need a phone for calls anyways. I would much rather have real games than the apps I never use on my phone anyways.

Then any ebook reader, the Samsung galaxy camera, some android based watches... are also tablets by your definition, as they are touch screen mobile device with multiple computer-esque functions and apps.

Is the Sony Smartwatch a tablet?



Around the Network
Kynes said:
KBG29 said:
Kynes said:
Chark said:
Kynes said:
Chark said:
The Vita has PlayStation Mobile which is an App store. It just launched so there aren't many titles but there is an expected 70 by Christmas and then they will start flooding in like mad. Android developers can easily port their apps over to PSM since they use the same code. The Vita has Netflix, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare, Google Maps, Email, a great web browser and more. Add in all of the apps it will be getting through PSM and you have yourself a tablet. Why don't people know this?


We know you love your vita, but please, stop the shilling. There are some phones with a bigger screen than the Vita, it can't be considered a tablet.

Shilling, what are you insinuating. Try adding to the conversation, don't just try and undermine what I say with your bias.

What's in a tablet? What counts now a days? With mini tablets can't it be one of those? "Tablets" should be considered more about what they do, how they function than the size of their screen. The Vita is a tablet, it is a touch screen mobile device with multiple computer-esque functions and apps.


Do you consider the ipod touch a tablet?


Why not? Tablets are just smart phones without the network chip in them. The bigger the tablet the more powerful, the smaller the opposite. 

I agree with others that Sony needs to make a vita with a network chip asap. In fact I have been saying that they should have a PSP phone since 2005. With the Xperia Play coming up on its 2 year anniversary, contract subscribers will be looking for something to upgrade to. Now is the perfect time. To make things even better there has been a major shift to phones with 5 and 6in screens. That would allow the Vita to fit right in. As chark has said, PSM has got apps covered, so they don't need android for these devices. Hell, I only need a phone for calls anyways. I would much rather have real games than the apps I never use on my phone anyways.

Then any ebook reader, the Samsung galaxy camera, some android based watches... are also tablets by your definition, as they are touch screen mobile device with multiple computer-esque functions and apps.

Is the Sony Smartwatch a tablet?

That watch is not a tablet because it doesn't compete with tablets.

Of course by definition the Vita isn't a tablet (even a vita tablet by definition wouldn't be a tablet) but going by the services the Vita provides it is. Chark is very much correct with his statements.



Kynes said:
Chark said:
Kynes said:
Chark said:
The Vita has PlayStation Mobile which is an App store. It just launched so there aren't many titles but there is an expected 70 by Christmas and then they will start flooding in like mad. Android developers can easily port their apps over to PSM since they use the same code. The Vita has Netflix, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare, Google Maps, Email, a great web browser and more. Add in all of the apps it will be getting through PSM and you have yourself a tablet. Why don't people know this?


We know you love your vita, but please, stop the shilling. There are some phones with a bigger screen than the Vita, it can't be considered a tablet.

Shilling, what are you insinuating. Try adding to the conversation, don't just try and undermine what I say with your bias.

What's in a tablet? What counts now a days? With mini tablets can't it be one of those? "Tablets" should be considered more about what they do, how they function than the size of their screen. The Vita is a tablet, it is a touch screen mobile device with multiple computer-esque functions and apps.


Do you consider the ipod touch a tablet?

Since it is essentially the same device but smaller, yes. What OP is really trying to say is they should make a Vita XL. The Vita is gaining functions and apps over time. It's OS is very similiar to Apple products as it is, running apps in the background, pages of icons, etc. It is catching up to devices that have been in the market for years.

As for the smartwatch, it is limited to specific social apps and functions, no web browser, no customizable interface, no data storage. It is a watch with social apps and a very limited touch screen interface.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

Kynes said:
KBG29 said:
Kynes said:
Chark said:
Kynes said:
Chark said:
The Vita has PlayStation Mobile which is an App store. It just launched so there aren't many titles but there is an expected 70 by Christmas and then they will start flooding in like mad. Android developers can easily port their apps over to PSM since they use the same code. The Vita has Netflix, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare, Google Maps, Email, a great web browser and more. Add in all of the apps it will be getting through PSM and you have yourself a tablet. Why don't people know this?


We know you love your vita, but please, stop the shilling. There are some phones with a bigger screen than the Vita, it can't be considered a tablet.

Shilling, what are you insinuating. Try adding to the conversation, don't just try and undermine what I say with your bias.

What's in a tablet? What counts now a days? With mini tablets can't it be one of those? "Tablets" should be considered more about what they do, how they function than the size of their screen. The Vita is a tablet, it is a touch screen mobile device with multiple computer-esque functions and apps.


Do you consider the ipod touch a tablet?


Why not? Tablets are just smart phones without the network chip in them. The bigger the tablet the more powerful, the smaller the opposite. 

I agree with others that Sony needs to make a vita with a network chip asap. In fact I have been saying that they should have a PSP phone since 2005. With the Xperia Play coming up on its 2 year anniversary, contract subscribers will be looking for something to upgrade to. Now is the perfect time. To make things even better there has been a major shift to phones with 5 and 6in screens. That would allow the Vita to fit right in. As chark has said, PSM has got apps covered, so they don't need android for these devices. Hell, I only need a phone for calls anyways. I would much rather have real games than the apps I never use on my phone anyways.

Then any ebook reader, the Samsung galaxy camera, some android based watches... are also tablets by your definition, as they are touch screen mobile device with multiple computer-esque functions and apps.

Is the Sony Smartwatch a tablet?


The watch obviously isn't but the Galexy Camera has actually been advertised as a full tablet in a camera. Also my Kindle Touch has a full browser but like no apps. Not a tablet. Internet connected device.



I see we have different views on what is a tablet. I abide to a most restrictive definition, one that has a big screen (bigger than a galaxy note) and almost no physical buttons, and some of you to a less restrictive one. Having used an iPad and a 7 inches Galaxy Tab, I can't consider the Vita a tablet, as it's main purpose is to play videogames, and media consumption is a less important feature, and a tablet main purpose is multimedia consumption, and playing games is a less important feature.



Around the Network
Kynes said:
I see we have different views on what is a tablet. I abide to a most restrictive definition, one that has a big screen (bigger than a galaxy note) and almost no physical buttons, and some of you to a less restrictive one. Having used an iPad and a 7 inches Galaxy Tab, I can't consider the Vita a tablet, as it's main purpose is to play videogames, and media consumption is a less important feature, and a tablet main purpose is multimedia consumption, and playing games is a less important feature.


Tell that to people who use their iPads for gaming mostly or those who use Vita for multimedia purposes mostly. Sure they might not be in the majority, but they exist. Social and media apps are highly rated along side games when analyzing Vita's Near function. When it comes to the importance of the device, it depends on function. If a smaller screen device does practically everything a large screened tablet does, it then has tablet functions making it qualify as a tablet device itself. The main break away of tablets from computers is that they are all in one touch screen mobile devices generally with a sub par computer OS. The Vita is breaking the divide between handheld gaming console and a tablet, similar to how Microsoft's premium full Windows 8 Surface tablet computer is breaking the divide between a tablet and a computer. (though maybe not the first to do so, their device is doing that regardless)

I use to carry around an iPod Touch 4 as my multi media web browsing device, but after getting a Vita I have no more need of it. They are both tablet devices in my eyes, or the equivelent in function. If we restrain tablet to screen size than a debate about a Vita tablet is meerly about the size of its screen and I don't see how that would be beneficial to the device in penetrating the market. People didn't buy the iPad because they didn't buy iPods or iPhones afterall. iPad is meerly an option of screen size of a product Apple already produced. As the Vita is its screen is plenty big enough and creating a Vita XL, or Vita tablet, would be a financial disaster. Sony could take their current line of tablets and allow for Vita games to be played for it after adding some physical buttons, but what kind of ungodly giant device would that be?

Anyway, I still hold that Vita is a tablet gaming device.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

Chark said:
Kynes said:
I see we have different views on what is a tablet. I abide to a most restrictive definition, one that has a big screen (bigger than a galaxy note) and almost no physical buttons, and some of you to a less restrictive one. Having used an iPad and a 7 inches Galaxy Tab, I can't consider the Vita a tablet, as it's main purpose is to play videogames, and media consumption is a less important feature, and a tablet main purpose is multimedia consumption, and playing games is a less important feature.


Tell that to people who use their iPads for gaming mostly or those who use Vita for multimedia purposes mostly. Sure they might not be in the majority, but they exist. Social and media apps are highly rated along side games when analyzing Vita's Near function. When it comes to the importance of the device, it depends on function. If a smaller screen device does practically everything a large screened tablet does, it then has tablet functions making it qualify as a tablet device itself. The main break away of tablets from computers is that they are all in one touch screen mobile devices generally with a sub par computer OS. The Vita is breaking the divide between handheld gaming console and a tablet, similar to how Microsoft's premium full Windows 8 Surface tablet computer is breaking the divide between a tablet and a computer. (though maybe not the first to do so, their device is doing that regardless)

I use to carry around an iPod Touch 4 as my multi media web browsing device, but after getting a Vita I have no more need of it. They are both tablet devices in my eyes, or the equivelent in function. If we restrain tablet to screen size than a debate about a Vita tablet is meerly about the size of its screen and I don't see how that would be beneficial to the device in penetrating the market. People didn't buy the iPad because they didn't buy iPods or iPhones afterall. iPad is meerly an option of screen size of a product Apple already produced. As the Vita is its screen is plenty big enough and creating a Vita XL, or Vita tablet, would be a financial disaster. Sony could take their current line of tablets and allow for Vita games to be played for it after adding some physical buttons, but what kind of ungodly giant device would that be?

Anyway, I still hold that Vita is a tablet gaming device.

Whatever makes you happy, you can call it in any way you want, but in the end, for the majority of the people and Sony themselves, it's a portable gaming system, not a tablet. When most of the people talk of a tablet they talk of iPads, galaxy tabs, kindles and nooks, not Vitas.



Kynes said:

Whatever makes you happy, you can call it in any way you want, but in the end, for the majority of the people and Sony themselves, it's a portable gaming system, not a tablet. When most of the people talk of a tablet they talk of iPads, galaxy tabs, kindles and nooks, not Vitas.

Which is why it is so disheartening and why I am compelled to advocate the device. Not only is there a lack of consumer awareness but also misinformation.
 I can't wait for PlayStation Mobile to go full swing so on top of showing people it has Netlix etc. it has a full blown app store as well.  Maybe the Vita will have an "aha" moment but if not at least gamers should get behind the device instead of cater to a console war fueled by the decline of Sony.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

Nah. Sony has to get their business together with Vita before extending their resources even further



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

as a standalone it has no appeal for me, I already have an iPad so why would I want/need another tablet?

as a controller I can see it working, the Wii U tablet looks really cool and clever, something similar for PS4/X720 would be something I can picture and could work well.