People can have hunches... You are just too much.

Heck, that's pretty much all nacho did.

let me explain me this to you even better: last round as scum i defended someone with no evidence just saying that i felt he was not scum. I got immediate suspicion because of it

Yeah, I think we've left that investigation behind us. But tabaha is still our best scum lead thus far imo, and I have him under HoS therefore ^^ other people I feel kinda iffy about is prof and hatz (but that all comes down to context) and yoshi, mantle and DT (but tha's all pretty much within its own context).

Those I feel is town the most is you and FF. And possibly prof and Hatz (again, context).

Tabaha, when all you have is a feeling and are pushing a lynch for it, then yes, it's scummy.

Your sentence almost reads like you don't think it's fair that miz isn't suspected for the same reason youwere.
Oh and as far as your taking offense to my evidence. You never actually answered the first part of my accusation, you only responded to the second part talking about modkilling.

Dont get all settled down yet danne. I'll have a lot more for you to think avout when i get home.

Oh, I'm not settled at all :) I'm never quite settled in a game of mafia =)

refering to:

"Where exactly did you find yourself "panicked" and "doing it wrong".

Am I to understand that when you "panicked" you instantly went into cool as a cucumber mode? Now why would someone who was self-admittedly panicking, play it calm?

All those responses show a huge amount of restraint."

I did not went into "cool as a cucumber mode" as you said. I got calm after the day ended, knowing his alignment and role and after a night of sleep. Not during the day

What do you think you should have done differently, knowing his alignment afterward?
You asked him yourself if there was any way he could be wrong, or not be using his role correctly.
I'm having a hard time understanding exactly where the panic occurred. You say the vote was panicked, and part of the reason, if i understand it correctly, was that it wasnt just a matter of keeping you both alive, but also how to prevent him from just shooting you tomorrow.

One of the problems I'm seeing is that at least part of me was worried about his alignment, and if he were left alive, as mafia, he could just be trying to buy himself time to shoot again.
At what point did you look back and say you did something wrong? Because even if he was town, that doesn't mean he'd shoot mafia. Him being alive was a risk to town, don't you think?
I'm confused as to how you should've expected yourself to handle the situation with the amount of information you'd been given.

Therein, why apologize? It's an apology for something that wasn't your fault, as i see it.
But then you also rationalize it by saying "there was no other way" (paraphrased from you saying "convince town AND not let him shoot me tomorrow")

I feel like i already answered to that >_>

Wow hatz, really? The guy goes back to show that you did exactly what you accused him of, and now he's guilty for digging it up? That's no good.

unvote Mantle

vote hatmoza

Now, Mantle, you need to retract what you said on DT because it holds no water. There was no theory DT was supporting with the two-team theory. Your memory is all blurred, and the Zero things is out the water. If it's not the Zero thing, what other theory was the two-team theory supporting? For reference this is in reply to this post: