tabaha said:
theprof00 said: Frankly, tabaha. I think someone TOLD you that you looked like you freaked out. I think THAT is why you wrote an apology of sorts in your very first post, like you were just really couldn't wait for day to start so you could come in here and talk about it. I asked you just earlier today about it, and you said: "after he got modkilled I efforted myself to analyze the whole situation." But your opening post says: "I shouldn't have voted for him when he said i was scum. I failed there and I admit it. I was panicking and facepalming way too much to do things properly. But point is, i can't think of a way to convince people that he was lying and making sure he wouldn't kill me the day after." So, you couldn't figure out how to not only clear yourself, but how to ALSO keep yourself from getting shot day 2. But in one of your own posts you said you would hammer yourself just so that you could laugh at town. Right? Seems a bit strange for a person panicking and worried about being SHOT the next day, to LAUGH at your own lynching. "I shouldn't have voted for him when he said i was scum. I failed there and I admit it. I was panicking and facepalming way too much to do things properly. But point is, i can't think of a way to convince people that he was lying and making sure he wouldn't kill me the day after." (I know I just posted this, but it's here to keep emphasis) You say this in reference to why your vote is on him. But yesterday, you voted him because you said he was lying. It just doesn't make sense to me that you were voting him as 'panicking', when as we've seen just with pezus last game, he KNEW mario was lying, and so voted him. That's not really panicking is it? You saw a claim that you KNEW was false, and so voted an obviously lying scumbag. Right? or no, wrong, you said, and again: "I shouldn't have voted for him when he said i was scum. I failed there and I admit it. I was panicking and facepalming way too much to do things properly. But point is, i can't think of a way to convince people that he was lying and making sure he wouldn't kill me the day after." Right here you're telling us that you voted him because: 1. You couldn't think of a way to convince people that he was lying 2. Make sure he wouldn't kill you the day after. In response: 1. He's lying, Right? So why are you apologizing for your vote on him? 2. Who was going to kill who, WHAT day after? One of you was dead last night. It was either going to be you or him. If he didn't get modkilled, it was going to be you. And then, it doesn't even really read like you thought he was scum. Why would you be nervous about him KILLING YOU TOMORROW, if he's mafia? You even said at one point "I'd claim, but I think it would help mafia, and I also have no guarantee that I'd even be believed" Umm, what? You just said you didn't know how to keep yourself alive, yet you refused to claim? I'm seeing a whole shitload of inconsistency in this story tabaha.
|
How hard is to understand that by panicking i was unable to logically think about how to solve the problem. Italic text was something i usually do. I'm not what you would call sane and seeing the fail that it would cause was enough entertainment for me.
I voted him on the heat of the situation. Panicking and raging and facepalming and god knows what. I wasn't able to get the proper solution. Proper solution would be not vote him, getting him to admit that he lied, don't get myself lynched and getting a good target for lynching. I apologized for my vote on him because it was clearly not the best option. But at the time I didn't realize it.
Bolded part: Not if I handled stuff properly. None of us would be dead
Underlined part: You're making it inconsistent. not me
|