By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 50 - Superheroes & Villains

miz1q2w3e on 25 November 2012
mantlepiecek said:

No, that is not my excuse. Why didn't you stop his lynch?

My reasoning for not "stopping" his lynch is because 1) he is playing badly, 2)that is if he is town, if he is sk then maybe it would be good for us to get rid of him 3) Defending him isn't as important as trying to lynch someone whom I consider scum.

If you see, I am actually trying to get DT lynched. Not ninetails.

I'm trying now, I just got here + I was thrown a bit off balance by hatz.

1) He wasn't playing badly, he was being cryptic (he didn't want to expose himself). His reply to me was sincere, he probably did play differently at other sites.
2) Fine, since I also thought he was a stupid day vig if true.
3) BS. I don't even know how you could say that... You could easily do both. I don't get this one.

He was already on his way to getting lynched, why do that and bring suspicion to yourself.



Around the Network
theprof00 on 25 November 2012
mantlepiecek said:
HaxtonFale said:
9TC keeps throwing "riddles" and wasting our time. As bad as I am at drawing conclusions from your lot's behaviour, he's suspicious enough.

Unvote, Vote: ninetailschris

You have been asked to support town if you know something and want to contribute, and yet all you do is saying hints. It means that you either bluff for fun or to confuse us. Both are bad.

This was the post for reference.

And yet you could have helped answer Haxton's question and you never voluntarily did so.



theprof00 on 25 November 2012
supermario128 said:
theprof00 said:

shut up mario, we are on to new things now. Stop distracting.

My bad. Don't let me distract you from Mantle. Although, he is the only one who seems to agree with me. :P

I find most of my scum reads from people who agree with me.



mantlepiecek on 25 November 2012
theprof00 said:
mantlepiecek said:
theprof00 said:

I'm saying you cannot prove your statement of "I have suspicions on someone voting for ninetailschris".

Repeating what I'm saying as if it's some incredulous accusation is not a defense. You should be questioning players you are suspicious of, and according to you:

mantlepiecek said:
theprof00 said:

explain, please. You have 'suspicions'? Have you questioned that person? Have you FoS'ed him?

No, I haven't questioned the person. He is the same person who was acting all lazy in the beginning of the day.

I haven't FoS'd him, but it is not necessary.

I can prove that. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4914587

You never questioned a player you suspected. You simply threw suspicion at YET ANOTHER NEWB who has also garnered attention for simply not knowing how to play.

Ninetails is not a newb. He has played mafia before, it is just his first time on VGC.

I am not throwing suspicion around. I am suspicious of him. Why don't you try and attack my points against Haxton then, if you think I am just throwing suspicion around?



mantlepiecek on 25 November 2012
theprof00 said:
mantlepiecek said:
HaxtonFale said:
9TC keeps throwing "riddles" and wasting our time. As bad as I am at drawing conclusions from your lot's behaviour, he's suspicious enough.

Unvote, Vote: ninetailschris

You have been asked to support town if you know something and want to contribute, and yet all you do is saying hints. It means that you either bluff for fun or to confuse us. Both are bad.

This was the post for reference.

And yet you could have helped answer Haxton's question and you never voluntarily did so.

He hasn't actually asked a question?



Around the Network
miz1q2w3e on 25 November 2012
mantlepiecek said:
miz1q2w3e said:
theprof00 said:

You were pretty confident to not only look at the posts pointing at him being day-vig, but also thought about how many shots he'd have, never outed to EVERYONE who wanted to know, like Hatmoza, Linkz, etc, SWEAR to not commenting on the lynch at all unless asked specifically by tabaha.

You are scum.

Not wanting to talk unless asked specifically... Makes sense; Less talking = less slips.

...and most of his big posts were just replies to prof.

Not wanting to talk? Tabaha asked me a question to which he wanted an answer, not something that I was implying from my post.

Not wanting to talk in general. You mostly never talked unless as a reply to someone.



mantlepiecek on 25 November 2012
miz1q2w3e said:
mantlepiecek said:

No, that is not my excuse. Why didn't you stop his lynch?

My reasoning for not "stopping" his lynch is because 1) he is playing badly, 2)that is if he is town, if he is sk then maybe it would be good for us to get rid of him 3) Defending him isn't as important as trying to lynch someone whom I consider scum.

If you see, I am actually trying to get DT lynched. Not ninetails.

I'm trying now, I just got here + I was thrown a bit off balance by hatz.

1) He wasn't playing badly, he was being cryptic (he didn't want to expose himself). His reply to me was sincere, he probably did play differently at other sites.
2) Fine, since I also thought he was a stupid day vig if true.
3) BS. I don't even know how you could say that... You could easily do both. I don't get this one.

He was already on his way to getting lynched, why do that and bring suspicion to yourself.

3) I couldn't do both easily. I was concentrating on DT, and others. YOU SHOULD REALIZE THAT IT is our responsibility to not lynch someone we think is town, and we decide whom to lynch by casting votes. I didn't want to lynch him, I didn't vote him.

He was on his way to getting lynched, why defend him when he wasn't? Why defend someone who may not even be town? Why defend someone who doesn't care to defend himself? WHY?

Why am I responsible for defending him? Just because I had a hunch that he could be the day vig? A hunch is all that, a hunch. It can be wrong as well.



theprof00 on 25 November 2012
mantlepiecek said:
theprof00 said:
mantlepiecek said:
theprof00 said:

I'm saying you cannot prove your statement of "I have suspicions on someone voting for ninetailschris".

Repeating what I'm saying as if it's some incredulous accusation is not a defense. You should be questioning players you are suspicious of, and according to you:

mantlepiecek said:
theprof00 said:

explain, please. You have 'suspicions'? Have you questioned that person? Have you FoS'ed him?

No, I haven't questioned the person. He is the same person who was acting all lazy in the beginning of the day.

I haven't FoS'd him, but it is not necessary.

I can prove that. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4914587

You never questioned a player you suspected. You simply threw suspicion at YET ANOTHER NEWB who has also garnered attention for simply not knowing how to play.

Ninetails is not a newb. He has played mafia before, it is just his first time on VGC.

I am not throwing suspicion around. I am suspicious of him. Why don't you try and attack my points against Haxton then, if you think I am just throwing suspicion around?

Not a rebuttal at all.

This is his first game here, and he is playing differently, and EVEN SAID THIS ISN'T LIKE THE MAFIA HE KNOWS, something that by the very merit of you mentioning that he has played mafia before elsewhere, ACKNOWLEDGE.

"Haxton is suspicious for his vote on ninetails"- That is called casting suspicion. Unless you are directly questioning and following a player's thoughts and actions, all you are doing is making town suspicious of everything.

It is not my job to attack your points on Haxton. For all I know, he is scum that you are simply pretending to suspect to look like town. Why should I attack your posts about haxton when I have no read on his, what, 8 posts?



happydolphin on 25 November 2012
supermario128 said:
happydolphin said:

Most of these arguments is grasping at straws. Add Mario to my scum reads list.

For the nacho one, Mario should at least provide a link to the quote.

As for 9TC knowing who is who, in a two-team game (which this almost indubitably is), that isn't a reasonable card to play.

The parotting of Trucks' already far-fetched case on DT here is not giving town points to Mario in my book.

Really? What do you have on day one besides grasping for straws. More often then not, my observations are correct, even though I don't have concrete proof. I can't see town Thanatos talking about a two mafia team or asking someone else if they are on the second team. It is just weird. Most of the other stuff is comparing play style to past games. If they play different or play like their mafia selves they usually are.

I quoted it, you can go find it yourself if you want. :P

Another person claiming we have two teams. Tell me Happy, how do you know that when everyone else has no clue? Add you to my scum list as well.

It isn't parroting. I was going to bring it up either way, he just happened to do it first. Also, what may seem far fetched to you may not be to someone else.

So you really think that as scum, after Trucks casts suspicion on DT, then you parotting him, then me pointing it out, and me agreeing with DT on the 2-team scum game, that I didn't think about hiding it? The reason I admit that the 2-team scum game is what I consider the most likely scenario is exactly because I have nothin to hide, i.e. I am town. Wow, just wow Mario.

Anyways, if you can't see how a town player can consider 2-team mafia games as the 90% likelyhood scenario, just take a look at the last two games I played in. One was GoT, with the main scum team, and the 2nd team, i.e. the CARTEL. Then you have the light-dark game hosted by Stefl, with the Evil shadowspawn, the Heroes and the Townies. Put two and two together and DT's play is totally legit, while yours is grasping at straws to cast suspicion on a townie. Trucks is guilty of the same thing.

As for me having to looking back for a post you quoted mid-sentence in a possibly misleading truncation... I'm sorry, but that is just bad play.



mantlepiecek on 25 November 2012
miz1q2w3e said:
mantlepiecek said:
miz1q2w3e said:
theprof00 said:

You were pretty confident to not only look at the posts pointing at him being day-vig, but also thought about how many shots he'd have, never outed to EVERYONE who wanted to know, like Hatmoza, Linkz, etc, SWEAR to not commenting on the lynch at all unless asked specifically by tabaha.

You are scum.

Not wanting to talk unless asked specifically... Makes sense; Less talking = less slips.

...and most of his big posts were just replies to prof.

Not wanting to talk? Tabaha asked me a question to which he wanted an answer, not something that I was implying from my post.

Not wanting to talk in general. You mostly never talked unless as a reply to someone.

Not true. I have been constantly talking this game, I probably have the highest activity. I have suspected people, I have provided my reads, when they change etc.