Well, I do appreciate that. And I hope you didn't take my comment the wrong way.

I've just noticed that some threads treat PC on equal footing with home consoles, and others don't. And it doesn't make much sense to me. It's a video game platform. It should be included in any conversation about video games.

I play all of my multiplatform games on PC and love my PC.  However they're not competing with the console market which is why I exclude them in debates like this. Now if we were talking about steam, vs XBL, Origin, PSN, etc I'd include them.  Even then though I dont have there numbers.  

And no I didn't take your comment offensive.  Just tired of seeing people complain in general.

Fair enough. Sometimes it's easy to criticize a thread without considering all the time and energy that went into it, and I'm sometimes guilty of that too.

Anyway, I don't want to derail the thread. So would you agree that the Xbox relies more on three or four heavy-hitters, and PS3 is a little more spread out? Surely the Xbox has the numbers, but does it have the better portfolio?

Of course I would agree with that.  Microsoft primarily relies on Halo, Gears, Forza, fable, and kinect.  People has read into this thread wrong.  If you ask me what has the better exclusives I will say Sony because they have a diverse profile.  But if you ask me who is more successful i will say microsoft. I like both for different reasons.  this thread was primariyl in reply to one person.

I see a lot of games I would rather play on my PC than on my 360 >_>