pezus said: Mantle: Why do you think linkz is 3rd party SK? Are you saying he's the poisoner? |
Yes, I think linkz is the poisoner. And hence 3rd party SK.
pezus said: Mantle: Why do you think linkz is 3rd party SK? Are you saying he's the poisoner? |
Yes, I think linkz is the poisoner. And hence 3rd party SK.
DarkThanatos said:
Zero was a bit of an idiot saying he was cop and going to investigate Stefl. If he hadn't then we would have had a confirmed scum this round with his scan on Stefl. He is confirmed town yesh though. |
Prof is "confirmed" in the sense he is playing very townish. Look at him carefully DT. He isn't sneaky, nor is he any danger to the town with his play. He is suspecting people and making extremely good points on many occassions - for eg his PM/OP thing. If he is thinking along those lines then he is town.
And I would like to make it very clear - I would rather not go for stefl's lynch even if he is probably scum this game. I want to catch someone else - I think pezus / linkz. Or tabaha.
I would like to hear from mario as well. It is essential what he thinks.
Player/Act |
One |
Two |
Three |
Four |
Five |
Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabaha |
Radish |
Stefl |
|
|
|
|
Spurge |
Radish |
|
|
|
|
|
Linkz |
Radish |
Pezus |
|
|
|
|
Trucks |
Stefl |
|
|
|
|
|
Stefl |
DT |
DT |
|
|
|
|
Radish |
No Lynch |
xxx |
|
|
|
|
Pezus |
Radish |
|
|
|
|
|
DT |
Radish |
Stefl |
|
|
|
|
Zero |
Radish |
Stefl |
|
|
|
|
F-F |
|
xxx |
|
|
|
|
Mario |
Radish |
Stefl |
|
|
|
|
Mantle |
No Lynch |
|
|
|
|
|
Prof |
DT |
Linkz |
|
|
|
|
Stefl @ L2
Please inform me of of any mistakes. If any.
And yes. xxx = pr0n
I am the black sheep "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson
I would advise the poison doctor to ask hatmoza about his role before he goes around protecting someone who is poisoned - I don't want any protection on myself so stay clear. Look for maybe someone whom you consider town. Maybe protecting yourself maybe a good idea if you can.
I am the black sheep "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson
TruckOSaurus said:
Nope, because thinking the poisoner is part of the Mafia is unreasonable. |
Even if poisoner is not part of Mafia- The rest of my point is equally valid.
Stefl would not know if there was a poisoner or not. That still means it is a safe thing for him to claim he was targetted by a poison doc. If there isn't a poison doc- perfect, it can't be disproved that there isn't one. The poisoner might have targetted the nightkill.
If there is a poison doc, then the poison doc would know that Stefl was lying, but to prove it, they would have to claim, and that would mean having to persuade town around, and then they would be killed that night.
Now do you agree with it?
So hyped for Rome 2: Total War
mantlepiecek said: And I would like to make it very clear - I would rather not go for stefl's lynch even if he is probably scum this game. I want to catch someone else - I think pezus / linkz. Or tabaha. |
Why?
I would have thought it would be better to take out a high likely scum now, then possibly mis-lynch. If Stefl really is a Mafia absorber, with Doc/poison doc protection- it just allows him to protect his scummates.
I am still a bit of a newb though, so I may be missing something glaringly obvious here. Please tell me what I'm missing or not considering
So hyped for Rome 2: Total War
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.