By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DarkThanatos said:
theprof00 said:
Anyone else think its strange that evryone is jumping on stefl so suddenly?
I smell a bandwagon.

While looking back through the thread I found this. Prof trying to remove suspicion on Stefl after a few people put him low down a scum list and one vote. 

Here he is again,trying to defend Stefl by saying i have nothing on him. A whole lot of nothing with the amount of posts disproving his points I have made. 

You are now even voting me because of it and your own paranoia. You are clearly linked in some manner. Scummates, neighbours, lovers?

Nope, no role linking at all, all he does in regards to me must be based on his role/opinion on me.

Also neighbours and lovers should be out of the question anyway in retroperspective on how I behaved towards prof.



Around the Network
DarkThanatos said:
theprof00 said:
Anyone else think its strange that evryone is jumping on stefl so suddenly?
I smell a bandwagon.

While looking back through the thread I found this. Prof trying to remove suspicion on Stefl after a few people put him low down a scum list and one vote. 

Here he is again,trying to defend Stefl by saying i have nothing on him. A whole lot of nothing with the amount of posts disproving his points I have made. 

You are now even voting me because of it and your own paranoia. You are clearly linked in some manner. Scummates, neighbours, lovers?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4878608 

Evidence for my first point^

 

@Stefl- if you both defended each other then that would be horrifically obvious. Prof has the least suspicion on him, so it makes sense he would defend you rather then the other way around.



So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

Or, of course, of his opinion on others.



It's kind of funny. My suspects are stefl, link and pezus, who were scum-mates last game. Kind of hard to believe all three of them could be scum but it is possible I guess.



DarkThanatos said:
DarkThanatos said:
theprof00 said:
Anyone else think its strange that evryone is jumping on stefl so suddenly?
I smell a bandwagon.

While looking back through the thread I found this. Prof trying to remove suspicion on Stefl after a few people put him low down a scum list and one vote. 

Here he is again,trying to defend Stefl by saying i have nothing on him. A whole lot of nothing with the amount of posts disproving his points I have made. 

You are now even voting me because of it and your own paranoia. You are clearly linked in some manner. Scummates, neighbours, lovers?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4878608 

Evidence for my first point^

 

@Stefl- if you both defended each other then that would be horrifically obvious. Prof has the least suspicion on him, so it makes sense he would defend you rather then the other way around.

If we are lovers or neighbours, no. A lover/neighbour should never ever attack his counterpart.



Around the Network
pezus said:
mantlepiecek said:

It's kind of funny. My suspects are stefl, link and pezus, who were scum-mates last game. Kind of hard to believe all three of them could be scum but it is possible I guess.

How can both I and linkz even be scum mates? He was harassing me for the most minor things in the universe for days

lol

I would rather not think through that route.



http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4878343

There is your first point against Tabaha. 

Oh wow- your main tunneling even begins after Tabaha makes a point against Stefl. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post?id=4878378

 

Then you make this post - http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4878877 

A nothing post, which raises supsicion on him, without any evidence or anything to respond to. So guarenteed to annoy because outrageously wrong. This is backed up by Spurge in the next post. Then just contiune through the page- its just you with poor arguments against tabaha. 

theprof00 said:
Nobody is going to lynch me ff, so feel free to actually vote for someone, like tabaha.

Encouraging other playesr to vote for him, with no evidence or reasoning. 

To show you doing this to wind him up- you can see him becoming more frustrated with you. 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4878958

tabaha said:

You're right. This post shows you cannot understad a single post i make. 

*snip*

How much more evidence do you need?


So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

Can i just highlight something in the post above to those who dont read the entire post.

His main tunneling on tabaha starts after tabaha makes a post questioning Stefl



So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

Stefl1504 said:
DarkThanatos said:
DarkThanatos said:
theprof00 said:
Anyone else think its strange that evryone is jumping on stefl so suddenly?
I smell a bandwagon.

While looking back through the thread I found this. Prof trying to remove suspicion on Stefl after a few people put him low down a scum list and one vote. 

Here he is again,trying to defend Stefl by saying i have nothing on him. A whole lot of nothing with the amount of posts disproving his points I have made. 

You are now even voting me because of it and your own paranoia. You are clearly linked in some manner. Scummates, neighbours, lovers?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4878608 

Evidence for my first point^

 

@Stefl- if you both defended each other then that would be horrifically obvious. Prof has the least suspicion on him, so it makes sense he would defend you rather then the other way around.

If we are lovers or neighbours, no. A lover/neighbour should never ever attack his counterpart.

Maybe you don't know you are lovers. Maybe Prof has a part of his PM which tells him he dies when you are lynched? Or maybe his objective is to keep you alive? 





So hyped for Rome 2: Total War

DarkT, please, point out where I put words into your mouth.