Right. So because I'm not all out saying this player is town or scum, because I'm weighing up both sides and came to the conclusion that it is too unsafe to vote him. 

You know, because I'm not being "hungry" and tunneling players. I'm actually playing for town. 

EVEN After FF has already asked my opinion on it, and I'm responding to a question.

If thats what a washing machine is, then I have absolutely no problem being it.  

Sorry for overestimating your "reading comprehension" -- it was pretty obvious IMO what about your post could be considered "defending nonparticipation". 

-.- Radish and I have not been sharing information. Yoshiya is a bloody nosy spy - an honest one though, and is all. All you did with that sentence is weaken your defense when it was barly even under attack.

You say you backed it up with evidence. But you didn't. You said "some of the things he's said are scummy", a vague statement, and "cannot handle being tunneled", which I have not actually done. I am not tunneling tabby, I simply asked him a question, to which he responded extremely poorly. So I'm interested to see how exactly my 'tunneling' of one post made tabby say 'something scummy'.

Your post is vague. Your post is wishy washy. Your post is suggestive of a lynchtrain voter.

If you were weighing both sides, you would be asking tabaha questions yourself, not advertising his mistakes.

ANd why would you say that if prof tunneled tabaha, it makes you feel like tabby is town? Is it because you think I'm scum? So then why haven't you asked me a single quesiton about really anything?

"you defended not participating in the form of posting what you considered to be evidence people were scum, because it would make them more careful"

"and now even when there IS something you just aren't sharing?
Oh you preferred that i said it early and let them (mario, zero and probably others that might had an OP explaining the map) just be aware of it and acting more carefully?"

Pretty irrefutable IMO. 

You twist my words when you say I said you defended "lurking" rather than "not participating in the form of posting what you considered to be evidence people were scum, because it would make them more careful", which is much more specific to the situation at hand.  Reading comprehension indeed. 

As for giving them more rope to hang themselves with, let me spell it out for you since you seem to require that:  I am telling you that I think you are incompetent to make that judgment, so just throw it all out there and let the chips fall where they may, until we tell you to stop.  Of course, I think you're scum, but if you're town then that's what you should do. 

@ town:  sorry for the big quote nest but IMO it was somewhat necessary due to the innermost post being relevant and not available on this page @ 50. 

That's how I am. Sorry

quote begins here:

"you defended not participating in the form of posting what you considered to be evidence people were scum, because it would make them more careful"

"and now even when there IS something you just aren't sharing?
Oh you preferred that i said it early and let them (mario, zero and probably others that might had an OP explaining the map) just be aware of it and acting more carefully?"

Pretty irrefutable IMO.  

You twist my words when you say I said you defended "lurking" rather than "not participating in the form of posting what you considered to be evidence people were scum, because it would make them more careful", which is much more specific to the situation at hand.  Reading comprehension indeed.  

As for giving them more rope to hang themselves with, let me spell it out for you since you seem to require that:  I am telling you that I think you are incompetent to make that judgment, so just throw it all out there and let the chips fall where they may, until we tell you to stop.  Of course, I think you're scum, but if you're town then that's what you should do.  

@ town:  sorry for the big quote nest but IMO it was somewhat necessary due to the innermost post being relevant and not available on this page @ 50.

ends here

first: sorry for retarded way of quoting

I didn't want to twist your words. As you said reading comprehension.

and i agree with the underlined part, but i can't just agree with the part right after it. I wouldn't feel that confortable to accuse someone based on something that may be just a typo without further proof on a game of no reveal

Oh so now you agree with me.

But yet, I disagree. THat's not how you are. In the past several games I have not seen much of anything by you that would convince me that your post is typical of your attitude. Sorry.

Maybe I misunderstood tunneling. I'd have thought unrelenting questions alonside to be classified as "tunneling". 

"My post is suggestive of a lynchtrain voter" - Pray- tell me where I decide to lynchtrain anyone? If i recall correctly - and i do - I have only voted a player once. Radish. At the start of the game, which has then coincidentally meant I random chose a scummy player. 

Ok right. So by weighing both sides, which advertises both your and tabaha's "mistakes" as you put it, that's somehow a bad thing? Forgive me if i'm wrong on this as well- but surely town knowing where people have made "mistakes" is generally well advisable for them to make their own opinion. 

I think pointing out your errors and disregarding many of your points is just a good a job as not considering the main reason I think you are scum is because of said errors. 

and again here i go. getting sick of it actually

I said sorry for being the way i am. I did not agree with you. And just look better because I'm sure it happened before.