Dt let me explain something.
I saw a great deal of your posts as potentially undermining to town, spreading lots of contusion and for example your insistence with trucks on the stefl fake poison doc claim that because it was possible then it could happen...these kinds of suspicions keep a town bubbling, unable to find a foothold until they inevitably drown.
However, i also see that you are adamantly arguing them, and being hypocritical by calling me a tunneler.
Furthermore some of your comments along with your own admission that you are a noob still, gives me the impression. That it's not that you're trying to mislead but that you really simply dont understand what you're doing. I would describe you as too scummy to be scum. A scum would never draw so much attention to themselves with whT i see as flawed arguments and then subsequently claim to be a noob. No, a noob scum would lurk and say "i don't know what to say".
So yes, i have come to the conclusion that you are a noob who stopped getting crazy with me BECAUSE you have been enlightened, not because you simply are avoiding suspicion.
However, my patience does indeed have limits and i Am a paranoid person, so when you continue to undermine me, it's exasperating because i immediately question you again only to say to myself again, "no. Don't suspect him he doesn't know what he's saying".
Eventually that comes to a point where i get frustrated and lash out, hence my recent snippiness with you. Do yourself a favor and try to see what I'm saying when i make comments, otherwise just stay out of my way for now.

Now then, as i said, which you ignored and kept pressing, when i get to a computer i will explain to you my suspect list. Until then please try not to make another sarcastic quip, for my own sanity's sake.

I don't recall saying I'm only suspicious of spurge. And yes, if spurge isn't making my head hurt from the frequent and often-unreasoned changes in opinions than I believe him to be scum. Why are you suspicious of me again?

The A was in reference to "vote" though having reread the wench/wrench thing I see that it was DT who claimed radish had a wrench. So that aspect of my certainty in his alignment is gone, but doesn't change how I felt day one.

Yes, now that you mention it I believe hat had the same thing the last time he hosted. But I was thinking of what he said when he originally talked about the Clue theme, which was the Clue weapons. So those would be a distinguishing feature of scum, though hat should have told them that's the case.

I would guess I'm 2 or 3 votes away from hammer, so you're probably safe in voting.

I was only games at the start of the day, once I returned it was serious business, even if I wasn't explicit about everything.

I am still confident about radish, but I have no mod-given proof. I had planned not to use my role at all, or possibily late game if needed, but that may change depending on answers to questions I have yet to ask hat.(since I planned on not using the role anyway) Either way, I'm not claiming today so if I'm lynched then just count me as Town Vanilla. I can say that it's almost impossible for there to be any bus driver or redirector.

First, of course yes. And as someone that highly depends on role meta, it's a big disadvantage for me on top of that.

Second, clearly the case.

Yes I agree that a Mafia Absorber just doesn't fit. It could be possible that Stefl steals abilities rather than copies them,(Note that they would not be notified if that is the case) but then that doesn't help him in the end. Meaning zero is now an obvious doc save solely due to the role, so even if the actual doc can't save him, Stefl still can't kill him or the doc could cry foul.

Vhat you say? That just doesn't even make sense.(And I don't mean the typos)

If you're talking about the round I hosted, Trucks was either BP or had a percent chance of being untargetable.

And did you forget that you made me a SK that scanned guilty?

Yes it does. Normally you will quote adozen, 2 dozen quotes whrn you show up again. I havent really seen that this round.

pezus did say he was suspicios of me of, in response to you. Or do you mean I didn't say I was suspicious of you?

And I've barely had any reaction to those suspicious of me. The only reaction to suspicions of others that I recall were those directed at zero day 1.