metacritic user reviews is pretty lame,not just Halo 4,almost every game will become Fanboy score vs Hater score

Did GT just say Halo 4 had no Cooperative Campaign?

It has split-screen co-op campaign and online co-op for Spartan Ops. They must have just meant that it doens't have online campaign co-op.

Yep, it's completely worthless. The only thing it's good for is laughing at the stealth haters trying to pass off their troll reviews as legit when you can tell they've never even played the game.

It had online campaign coop,i think GT means no random matchmaking campaign coop

Well maybe 343 will add it later,just like Halo Reach

Expected higher from GT. It wont be their GOTY seeming as GT ALWAYS in the last 4 years have given it to the game with the highest score of the year (kinda how it should be when you think about it)

x360 magazine - 9/10
pushstart - 9.5/10
usa today - 4/4
entertainment Focus - 9/10
ibtimes - 8/10
wc- 5/5
trueachievements - 4/5
Heritage - 4/5
ITF Gaming - 9.8/10
clickonline - 5/5
the telegraph - 4/5
el33tonline - 4/5
mmn - 4/5
g3ar - 10/10
gaming union - 9/10
gameplanet - 8.5/10
atomic gamer - 8/10
the independent - 4/5
paste - 8/10

A lot of 8's. I hope they dont get added to meta because it seriously can pull it down further.

EDIT: 8/10 from atomicgamer was added today >_>

Haters gonna hate.

Meta User Score: 3.7

lol lol lol

Didnt even notice that. I NEVER look at user score. I mean I understand critics cause contreversy and what-not but seriously. The thought of me being able to give a game 0 or 10 .. xD. The scores just feel like they are bound to be hyperbolic.