um, no.  Uncircumsized penises are revolting.

I knew this thread was created by you, even before opening it.

And I don't mean it in a nice way... not at all.

it's always more polite to show your face

Lol.  

On topic, I think it is a relatively small issue to be concerned about.

Revolting? Kind of a strong word to describe the way a man is supposed to be.

Glad I'm not. I understand it's somewhat of a standard to do it in the US, though.

Nope for the US it would be strange. Plus I think uncircs look like cacoons.

Yes it is less common now. http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/04/sujata-gupta-contributorsan-fr.html

Nah, I don't care about it nor do I dwell on it. I assume that a majority of people against circumcision aren't circumcised. If it was such a big deal then I believe a lot of males in USA would revolt or at least protest. If I ever had a son I wouldn't circumcise him. I don't blame my parents or have resentment for them doing it to me. It is a non issue to me and I don't cry over a loss flap of skin that has more nerve endings in it.  I can still get off and that is all that matters.

Whenever I imagine my parents had circumcised me I think I would be very angry at them (because it makes masturbating much harder, and in fact that was the prevailing motivation for circumcision in history, despite many people nowadays claiming that it's done because of health/hygienic reasons).

On the other hand, I probably wouldn't really be angry a my parents, because I would have never known how it is having a foreskin, I would have simply arranged myself with the situation.

But I've read that studies have shown that circumcised men often have inferiority feelings towards uncircumcised men and lower self-esteem.