spurgeonryan said:
man-bear-pig said:
I think your play is scummy. What do you think about that?
HoS spurge
|
Yeah. As scum I went head on with a vanilla townie to the death. Many did not base their decisions off what I said. They based it off how Pezus played and what we saw from the guy. Prof himself said he thnks I am right, but trusts himself. Rol would not trust me for a instant, but he saw how pezus was playing and went for it. I was just the first one to push him, everyone else thought the same thing about him.
|
This is WIFOM and pretty poor at that, since nobody even knew pezus was vanilla until very shortly before the deadline. Normally I'd think that's scummy, but here I'm just pointing it out to you because I'm fairly sure you are town now.
spurgeonryan said: Also. Even though I have linkz on my trust list. Why would this guy vote for pezus at the last second? That is something scum does when things get out of hand faster than they would like and they do not want to look like they stayed off their guy so they do a quick vote out of panic. But Pezus is town and he was going down without linkz vote. Then linkz kept bringing up some random quote from me. Why I thought he was town when he did something tricky. It is like he is slowly changing his play style. Last game I think he was lynched for doing something illogical if I remember correctly. No he does something else strange at the end. Oh he was scum last game as well. I pointed this out before already. What is the reason linkz? Reverse pychology? You had no reason to vote pezus at the end. |
First, you were "my guy", not pezus. He didn't enter my radar until I was doing the isolation on him amidst trying to ask you something. I could have voted you and even with prof's unvote not counting, you would have been lynched if I wanted to. I shall prove that point today.
Do you not get why I thought you to be scum when you treated me as town from the start? That reminded me of your scum play from MLP, where you were giving me random compliments. However, when you provoked me to the point that I wanted to smash my head against a wall, that has townie written all over it. It distracted me from doing the re-read on pezus, but having re-read MLP during the night I do not regret my decision even though pezus was town. I did not feel great about him, and the whole "It is a tell, but I was joking about it being a strong tell" was enough for me to lean more scum than town. That vote was important because there was a lot of uncertainty in the air. DT could have tied things again so there wouldn't be a lynch, and prof is evidence of last second changes of mind. So a one-vote gap is no guarantee of a player being lynched.
And I get most of my information from how people go about lynches. Those that push them and those that evade them. Assuming I lived through the night, I was ready to come in blazing about prof's attempt to unvote and then his follow up post, which I believed was reverse psychology. As has been pointed out, DT looks very bad for his unvote of you while not voting pezus, or even no lynch or his apparent scumspect Nacho. I stressed last game how important it is to place meaningful votes, so that's not a mistake that should be let go easily. If I didn't have the town read on you I would question your alignment for basically pushing pezus all of yesterDay with no reasoning, but MBP did the same and I don't have such a read. Plus there's tabaha and Stefl who had voted you. So a lynch generated many leads, whereas no lynch would have only left many questions.
Also, I wasn't lynched for doing anything illogical, unless you mean that my actively asking people to join the zero lynch was illogical and led to prof scanning me,(though I'd say yoshi, who wasn't even connected to me, diverting your "hint" at my guilt was the spark for my scan) which is actually what got me lynched.