I think that's a much trickier proposition.  Everyone who owns a Wii and purchases a Wii game has the Wii mote and Nunchuk.  Not everyone who buys a game that is "Kinnect Compatible" owns Kinnect.  For example, there is no real way of knowing how many of the 6.21 million copies of The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim were purchased by Kinnect owners, if any.  I think you would have to limit the comparison to games that "Require Kinnect". 

You missed Mario & Sonic at the olympic games: 7.85m

Yeah I was just about to say that.

Nintendo published that in Japan only.  Sega published it in North America and Europe.  Since it only sold .66 in Japan, 7.19 of sales should be added to the list.

Not in North America and Europe. It was Sega.

Nintendo only in Japan, like Just Dance.

No one justifies it this way, though. The justification for excluding PC is that it's not a console. Even then, you could argue that it's unfair since excluding PC multiplats only really benefits the 360. The same way, this only benefits the PS3 here (and greatly, at that).

Also, the fact that I'm far from the only one here who finds this comparison ridiculous speaks volumes, don't you think?

Oh, and I said the first Mario and Sonic; the one that sold 7.85m. After looking it up, I see that it was actually published by Nintendo and not Sega even though the DS version and subsequent games in the series were. That's just odd.

Yes. Difference will come in the total sw. Wii would stand at 46M, still 12M behind PS3.

why not compare the 3 ones already?

PC plays games. PC is a console.

Pretty ironic when consoles are just wanabee PCs