Yup. Like I said. It is better to leave that decision for last. It is very likely we do have a godfather so there could be a chance we lynch them beforehand and then we don't have to worry about pezus being one.

I want to win this game. That is all.

My vote was because I thought Pezus was mafia, since I didn't think Stefl was.

Mafia had the disadvantage this game, so let us see what they can do.

Why would you assume mafia would tell the truth when doing so would give town a huge upper hand?

It was your theory that there was a power per group, not mine.

But yes, if a miller exists then claim now.

Radish, in case anyone hasn't asked this yet :-

When did you scan me? And when did you scan Pezus?

Pezus night 1, you night 2

@ bolded, he never said that, he said that we should be the last decision...

First off, I asked the same question some time ago already... T__T

Second: Can you please elaborate your reasoning on investigating mantle night 2?

(also with everybody checked in, and no counterclaim, there is no reason to doubt your claims)

Well it was only Mantle and Spurge left in the Pinkie group, and I thought Mantle was more suspicious than spurge. It didn't matter who I investigated, because the other one would be more than likely mafia.

Aye, I read that, this deepens my thought on one of you two being mafia, in this case mario in particular. I would love to hear what you think about prof's theorem about power roles and linkz counterpoints. Try to keep it without rolehints if possible, if you deem rolehints (vanilla/powered) unavoidable, feel free to ignore this.

BTW, I agree on profs theorem, and that it is not necessary that the deputy/cop from one group are a counterindicator.

Okay, so which reasoning was it that made mantle more suspicious than spurge? Because it does matter who you investigated, not that much, but it surely does matter, and I kinda have a bet going with myself that your reasoning with mantle > spurge is lacking...