Hat attacked mario with a post back in day 1. The attack was what made me notice he is town.

Really prof? The very next post was Soleron asking for an explanation and the one following that is the reply... Are you re-reading every post in a bubble?

Yes I've read the content after I noticed you had addressed it. 

However, I still had some questions, like what is it about Hat attacking Mario that made you think that?

Do you mind, linkz? I can just go back to coding if you'd like.

I don't recall you being spoken to.

j0 what would you say the intent of this post was>?

His post seemed genuine to me. A genuine question. I figured if he wanted to mislynch mario he wouldn't use something that has proof against already, but he didn't know it.

A situation? What situation are you talking about?

"FIrst I use hatmoza"

For what? SO what did I use hatmoza for huh?

"Then slip in the suspicion lists going around"

Wth.

"

And yet you clarify that I was right with the double FoS I linked to. You know I assumed that was your base of suspicion? Because it was our only interaction of day 1. You did not bring up the reason for suspicion at all during the day, just said you were suspicious. If I didn't guess that's where it started than I must be an idiot.

"

Do you realize that's not all I've, right? I said I've been watching you since day 1 early. Your "assumption" was a fail right here.

You don't need to have an interaction to be suspicious.

"

(1) Um, the fact that you and hatmoza were the ones who were vocal about it kinda means that when I mention the suspicion on me, I had the two of you in mind.

"

Why? Considering he refused why didn't you ask me then? Explain why you were lax back then in asking questions when you are now so interestingly aggressive?

"

Guys, mantle is obvious mafia. I... just can't believe he would use this reasoning as a coherent town.

"

lol. "mantle is obvious mafia because he is attacking someone (myself) with reasons I want to believe as simplistic" is what I got from this line.

"

Also, you chose to ignore all of my arguments on you. Instead you tried to find out why I'm scum with even more weak reasoning.

"

I don't think I've ignored any arguments made by you. However I did try and find out if you are scum.

"

Yes, I think you are mafia because I say you slipped. Either a really bad player or a mafia would try to take advantage of a situation to vote someone. As i showed in my post, you're suspicions on me have been relying on the situations. First you use hatmoza, then slip in the the suspicion lists going around. Finally, there's nothing, so you decided to change it up and try to use the fact that I've been ignoring your simplistic posts (I'm talking about the response to links). Mantle, I'm not going to respond to weak posts like that that hold no content. You have played mafia long enough to realize that they don't do anything. If you want some traction with your suspicions, you actually try to bring someting substantial to the table, something which you have been keen on not doing for the entirety of the game.

"

You have no idea what a slip is, then. Situational evidence can be pretty powerful scumhunting tool. Unless you were away or something, but you weren't. Your thinking throughout this game can be interpreted because of your own posts.

Haha, apparently there is nothing against you so I am using your ignorance as a weapon. I am not surprised you didn't get exactly why I attacked you then. The concept isn't simple, and yet you think it is simple lol.

Let me say it again, you ignored me. Why did you ignore me? Why didn't you attack me? Why are you NOW attacking?

It is a simple observation. If I had voted you on day 1 you would have attacked me then. I wanted to see exactly how long you will go without mentioning me or hat. AND that isn't even everything about you, really.

That was my first post of day 2, and the ones who were suspicous based on meta were pezus and zero.

While my attack on you isn't flavor meta.

"

Also, at the sentence above it, so because I analyzed you over the day it's me making things up? You're just waving things away at this point without trying to argue them.

"

No, it's you trying to defend yourself with a weak reasoning. You haven't yet told me why you didn't press hat, so hat says he is suspicious and doesn't give reasons for it, and you don't even question it?

The way I see it you didn't want to shed any more light on it and hoped the town would forget it.

Way to go prof! I'll let you have the honors.