c03n3nj0 said:
Finally for for fucking mantle. Fuck you! (Naw, i'm kidding, I'm just not in the best of moods - trying to multitask and it's getting crazy, more things than college admissions).
--------------------------------------------------
Here's the thing, I have noted your posts. A good number of your posts indeed say that you are suspicious of me, but then that's where they stop. You did not try to push further, or rather try to lay evidence our there. You opted out to repeating it multiple times when you came in.
Now, i'm going to assume that your "suspicion" on me started with these posts, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4746820, because that is our earliest interactions. (It's kinda ironic now that you try to focus on me being redundant, and then proceeded to say the same thing without chaning it much for a day, hehe)
I say I assume because you decided not to mention your reasoning in your posts, like I said, you just repeated that you were suspicious without any attmepts to push for the lynch, or convince people that I was suspicious. It isn't MY job to get you to lay out your suspicions. It is yours. And you did not do your job as a townie.
And based on that background info, this is why I think you just showed yourself as mafia:
When day 2 comes along, you don't base your vote on the previous suspicions you had, but rather, on the fact that I did not confront you. This is because you yourself have realized that all those "suspicion" posts were just filler, and not actually a strong basis for suspicion.
In this post during day 1 right here, you just say that you feel better about it because hatmoza expressed suspicion too: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4749258
Why not lay them out? Instead, you are using hat's credibility to lay weight to your claims. It's a subtle way of not actually scum-hunting, and yet pretending like you are making a suspect list and thinking things out.
Your posts involving your suspicions on me were also during the time frame of the meta-gaming fiasco, (as shown by the "pinkie pie" in the above post). During that time frame you laid low, and did not attempt to gather suspicion on yourself. Instead you joined the voices of the useless pointing out suspects without much basis ( I have already shown my stance on that: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4751561).
You did not try to elaborate your suspicions then either, because I was in a group of linkz and yoshi, and you thought It wasn't necessary. You joined the flow of the ordeal very nicely, mantle. You hardly scum-hunted.
This post rounds you up nicely: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4751802. You sustain your psuedo suspicion while going with the flow of the general town. You say you are suspicious of me, and then decided that Noctis is a viable lynch.
Here's why you slipped up:
Your day 2 vote on me is bullshit and you know it. You want to twist the idea away from the suspicions you had on day 1 into the one where I'm scum because I didn't confront you.
------------------------------------------
Also, i just read your latest post listing the links. That proves my argument. You are just focusing on a reasoning based on circumstance, because there is nothing much else.
Also, this link you showed about me ignoring you and going for noctis:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4751088
In that post you just made, you ignored the fact that I mentioned that there WAS suspicion on me. You also ignored the fact that I was discussing my relationship with links and yoshi while doing so. Again, it leads me to believe you are basing your "suspicion" on circumstancial evidence, hoping that there's dirt on me that you don't have to point out. That dirt being the process of elimination between me, yoshi and links.
As for me not pushing hatmoza: I asked him why he was suspicious, and he stated he'd rather not say. It is not my job to get him to lay out his suspicions. You trying to use that is so freaking iffy. He's dead now, though. So the point is moot now.
|
So many things wrong with this post. You can't be town honestly if you actually ASSUMED my stance. You are scum conj.
You ASSUMED (lol) that I didn't want to give reasons for my suspicion?
"
When day 2 comes along, you don't base your vote on the previous suspicions you had, but rather, on the fact that I did not confront you. This is because you yourself have realized that all those "suspicion" posts were just filler, and not actually a strong basis for suspicion.
"
Err. How do you know my reasons? How do you think that I gave away all my reasoning for voting you in Linkz's post? The fact that you FoS'd me twice itself is what started my investigation on you.
THE FACT is conj, YOU aren't town. BECAUSE YOU ARE SOFT. Get it?
What town member assumes my reasoning? What town doesn't get suspicious of others when someone else is supsicious of them? Unless they are proven innocent, in this case you already know I am town. And hence why you were so lax in your investigation.
"
In that post you just made, you ignored the fact that I mentioned that there WAS suspicion on me. You also ignored the fact that I was discussing my relationship with links and yoshi while doing so. Again, it leads me to believe you are basing your "suspicion" on circumstancial evidence, hoping that there's dirt on me that you don't have to point out. That dirt being the process of elimination between me, yoshi and links.
"
The acknowledgement of suspicion residing on you is not equal to acknowledging hat and my suspicion, especially when we were the only ones who were very vocal about it. I said it twice, at least, and your ignorance of it is proof of you being scum conj.
Your ignorance of both your own suspicion on me (you were suspicious of me after the radish incident, which you seemed to conviniently forget, and apparently it didn't struck your mind that I could be mafia till I voted you, hilarious) is proof to me, you were the best lynch we could have on day 1, and are even now.
. Anyway 108 replays O_O, its going to take me a bit to have a look at all that.
