supermario128 said:
We have gone over this a long time ago Linkz. Why are we bringing it up again? I already stated very early on that the only ones who could have lied were probably the last two or three people who claimed, but even then I'm not so sure they did. They did have the benefit of Moreno never claiming after all. You can believe they lied of you want, but I'm going to assume they didn't. Better to not complicate things unless we have a reason for doing so. As in, we shouldn't assume they lied until we have evidence that says they did. |
Let's say we lynch spurge and he's scum, woohoo! Tomorrow radish reports an innocent scan on someone in your group, but someone else is lynched and flips scum too. But oh noes! a godfather hasn't flipped yet. Then, because you assume scum intentionally put themselves in a situation that gives town the upperhand, you lynch Stefl and pezus in whichever order and they both happen to be town. Who could blame you right, there was never evidence mafia lied.
And that's why making assumptions just to simplify things is bad. It's one thing to make an assumption if you have evidence supporting it, but that's not the case either. Now you shouldn't assume that they lied either, but it should be kept in mind that it's possible.