Using that logic, Nintendo must be in a 'huge pit of debt' too since they lost money last quarter.  Which, of course, is far from the truth.

He asked me if the Sony gaming division posted a recent profit.  They did not and neither did Nintendo as you said.  The difference is that Sony has had a lot of losses reported while Nintendo recently has started posting them.  That is why Sony's gaming division is in much more trouble than Nintendo's.    

More trouble, absolutely.

I actually thought you put "massive pit of debt" when you first posted, which is why I bothered to comment (because that's not necessarily true).  But it's not there now.

I am tired, so it could be that, but I also see that nice green moderator banner next to your name.  I'll be watching you...

yeah they should so we can get a console with sub par graphics and gimmicks, has a 52 % failure rate and costs 600 bucks.....

The idea is that they would compile the best parts of their systems not the worst.

i was being sarcastic bro :P

No offence but why would Nintendo or its fans want Sony stuff?

I had a ps1 I have a ps2 and I have a ps3 I also have a PSP (this console was a waste of money IMHO)

(i dont mean to troll. this is my humble opinion so please accept it and If you dont believe that I own Sony consoles i will post pictures Why do I own them? Because of the exclusive THIRD party games)

God of war is some sort of Devil May Cry that looks good because its zoomed out. Its still fun

Uncharted is a Tomb Raider clone.

Little big planet is interesting okay.

Little Big Planet karting is a Mario Kart clone.

Playstation allstars battle royal is a smash bros clone that needs third party characters to be interesting and pretends to be different because it doesnt use Smash's main gameplay type but they use one of the several gametypes you can chose in smash.

Ratchet and Clank is made by an independant company (the games are STILL exclusive tho)

Resistance is not made by Sony   the one that was made by a Sony owned studio is shit  (the vita one)

Killzone maybe.

INFamous is cool

Heavy Rain (is not owned by Sony)

Yakuza great but not owned by sony its a Sega game.

MOST NOT ALL  of the games I listed starting with Ratched and Clank are owned NOT by sony or are NOW owned by sony because sony bought the devs that were independent. (so this means if sony bought or gave  financial aid to external companies Nintendo can do this too if they would want to)

What happened to  MediEval?

Every little step of evolution the controllers have are on nintendo consoles first. and the 360 controller is more comfy than the ps123 controller (the original 360 had shitty d-pad tho) (btw I also own a 360)

I mean really what is THERE for Nintendo fans to gain when teaming up with sony that really has something to do with Sony and not its third parties? Nintendo should team up with all the third party devs that make games for Sony consoles (for whatever reason they do exclusives....)

The other way around yeah I see how Sony could gain something but what would Nintendo gain?

Thanks for reading. And please dont hesitate to come up with criticism .

Why would they hate them for it? If it wasn't for Ninty dropping them there wouldn't Playstation as we know it. PS1 and PS2 were huge successes, PS3's failures have nothing to do with Nintendo.

I have faith in Nintendo that they wouldn't allow this.

I like my Sony and Nintendo separate, just like Corn and Mashed Potatoes.

Nintendo should definetly become part of Sony. I would like to have Team ICO team up with Miyamoto.