By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sports - The NFL Thread 2012: Baltimore Ravens win Super Bowl XLVII

 

Who will win the Super Bowl? Part II

Denver Broncos 24 18.75%
 
New England Patriots 14 10.94%
 
Houston Texans 1 0.78%
 
Baltimore Ravens 29 22.66%
 
Glasgow Rangers 3 2.34%
 
Atlanta Falcons 4 3.13%
 
San Francisco 49ers 29 22.66%
 
Green Bay Packers 4 3.13%
 
Seattle Seahawks 6 4.69%
 
I am a wuss, but I want to see the results. 12 9.38%
 
Total:126
Mendicate Bias said:

Yea my bad your right. Pats have been excellent against the run this season but the 49ers were getting at least 5 yards every run which killed the Pats.

While the 49ers did have a fumble and interception they were far less costly because they were deep in Patriots territory. If i remember correctly every single turnover we had was on the Pats side of the field except for the first interception.

Well the 49ers do have the second ranked rush offense in the league at almost 163yds/gm and they do avg. 5.2 yards per attempt, so it was consistent for them. Running well also helps with time of possesion. Even though the Pats ran way more plays than the 49ers (92 vs. 65), the 49ers still had a slight time of possesion advantage. Many of the 49ers scoring drives were quick as well, which contributed to the lower amount of plays.

I don't know if they were less costly as they could have added to the score and put the game away earlier. Fumble at the 5, they would most likely have scored a TD or at least a FG. The INT and the fumbled 4th and 1, both times they were around the Pats 30yd line and most likely would have scored/had a decent chance for the first down and a score after. Akers also missed a not too far away FG from about 40 yards. He was lights out last year, which is why he went to the pro bowl, but he's been inconsistent this year. (He missed makeable overtime FG's in both games against the Rams which contributed to the Tie and Loss.) Not to mention the other mishandled snaps which wasted plays/caused yardage losses and those near muffed punts... 49ers could have played a lot better.

Not related to the post, but I just got some nice stuff from my parents. I forgot to pick up a 49ers hat for myself when I was back home in California this past summer, so this fills in very nicely!




starcraft: "I and every PS3 fanboy alive are waiting for Versus more than FFXIII.
Me since the games were revealed, the fanboys since E3."

Skeeuk: "playstation 3 is the ultimate in gaming acceleration"

Around the Network
amp316 said:


The best thing for the Bears would be for them to fire the entire coaching staff, dump Urlacher at the end of the year (he's too pricey and slow), get a completely new offensive line, and to start drafting defensive players since the entire defense is getting old at the same time.  Oh, and maybe they can pick up a tight end that can catch and a couple of recievers that can do the same.  Marshall can't do it all by himself.  

Besides for that, I think that they are looking great.  

How do you go from 7-1 to 8-6?  The finger has to be pointed at someone and that someone is the head coach.

I dunno about dumping Urlacher. If you can negotiate a much lower salary (I know), I'd say he's still worth it: he's lost several steps since his youth, but he really is a "smart linebacker" that still brings a lot to the table.

The rest of it is true.



Big Bens D will be a test for Daltons pretty solid, but not so good at finishing offense, but Big Ben has struggled against average defenses as of his last 2 games. hopefully Big Ben, can pick up the peices, and get back into form, cause the Bengals D isn't a push over. So i think it best Ben be close if not 100%

the Steelers will likely win, but i'm a bigger Bengals fan.



amp316 said:
noname2200 said:
I'd like to offer you some sort of comfort.

But that's a pretty distinct possibility.


The best thing for the Bears would be for them to fire the entire coaching staff, dump Urlacher at the end of the year (he's too pricey and slow), get a completely new offensive line, and to start drafting defensive players since the entire defense is getting old at the same time.  Oh, and maybe they can pick up a tight end that can catch and a couple of recievers that can do the same.  Marshall can't do it all by himself.  

Besides for that, I think that they are looking great.  

How do you go from 7-1 to 8-6?  The finger has to be pointed at someone and that someone is the head coach.

I am assuming what you say of Urlacher is based on his actions in the last game and later statements about Smith and the fans. Booing your own fans is not proffessional at all and I think this alone should send him out of Chicago. I think Cutler once flipped off booing Denver fans. Fans do not forget these types of things quickl, after all the fans pay the NFL's salary. He should be let go. The statements defending Smith and once again insulting the fans is another reason he should go. The team would be better if they move away from ground and pound style with defense and work on a team that can score a lot quickly. It seems to be a requirement in the league for true success, now that defense in games is hardly allowed.



superchunk said:
ATL-DET 1
OAK-CAR 2
BUF-MIA 2
NE-JAC 1
IND-KC 1
NO-DAL 1
WAS-PHI 1
STL-TB 2
SD-NYJ 2
TEN-GB 2
MIN-HOU 2
CLE-DEN 2
CHI-ARI 1
NYG-BAL 2 SF-SEA 2
CIN-PIT 10-13

A few tough picks here... but the only game I'll be watching this week is Bears beating up on Cardinals live in AZ. (please for the love of God let Cards suck again)

Though that SF-SEA game is gonna be a good one. It has to be... both solid teams and a divisional rivalry. Hard to pick.. had to go with Seattle at home though.



Around the Network
ATL-DET 1
OAK-CAR 2
BUF-MIA 2
NE-JAC 1
IND-KC 1
NO-DAL 1
WAS-PHI 1
STL-TB 2
SD-NYJ 1
TEN-GB 2
MIN-HOU 2
CLE-DEN 2
CHI-ARI 1
NYG-BAL 1 SF-SEA 1
CIN-PIT 31-24


I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

RolStoppable said:
ATL-DET 1
OAK-CAR 2
BUF-MIA 2
NE-JAC 1
IND-KC 1
NO-DAL 1
WAS-PHI 1
STL-TB 2
SD-NYJ 1
TEN-GB 2
MIN-HOU 2
CLE-DEN 2
CHI-ARI 1
NYG-BAL 2 SF-SEA 2
CIN-PIT 17-28


My Texans will get the #1 seed in the AFC.



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

I am new to this thread, but I was just wondering why does everyone estimate the score for the CIN-PIT game but none other?



Farsala said:
I am new to this thread, but I was just wondering why does everyone estimate the score for the CIN-PIT game but none other?


it is rols tiebreaker rules

i was just looking at the fixtures and all games start on sunday this week right,no sneaky earlier games



                                                                                                                                        Above & Beyond

   


ATL-DET 2 OAK-CAR 2
BUF-MIA 2
NE-JAC 2
IND-KC 2 NO-DAL 2 WAS-PHI 1
STL-TB 1
SD-NYJ 1
TEN-GB 2
MIN-HOU 1 CLE-DEN 2
CHI-ARI 1
NYG-BAL 1 SF-SEA 2 CIN-PIT 38-2

Even though I'm dead I'll keep voting and my choices will be even more extreme then before....



Former something....