http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/reply.php?id=145655&quote=4697150

Did this question get answered, nen? What was this about?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4692393

Where I reintroduce the pill discussion. Up until this point, everyone is pretty much content that noc is post restricted despite that he doesn't actually say pills in every post. People even quote him when he doesn't, yet don't say anything. Again, noc as a suspect seems to disappear.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4697177
My foray into nen and noc.

A couple posts down:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4697210
"I'd be willing to lynch one of these three people [stefl, noc, nen] but I'd like to see them fight for who should be the one. :D"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4697276
Nen's very next post is saying he's willing to lynch Noc

Linkz jumps in too
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4697411
"sure why not"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4697472
Nen previously said he would like a no lynch and does so. Here he unvotes no lynch and votes noctis as No lynch hits -2.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4697482
Linkz votes noctis, after a post earlier saying to nen "considering the vote rules,(50%) why would you vote no lynch"

So nen, it looks like you were right. There was not a heap of people on noc's case, just myself and linkz. But still, there was a distinct change from a vote-restricted townie, to ready for lynch as soon as I said the word. It's pretty blatant. However, After re-reading nen, my suspicion has gone down quite a bit.

Now onto another lead:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4695672

A votals, sak is in the lead.

Interesting post by Radish saying:
"if [SAK] was mafia, he'd be replaced without question, no?"

Responses by pezus and Linkz, respectively
"I'm not too sure about that"
"Stop trying to meta, especially horrible meta"

Linkz unvotes SAK. His original vote had no reason, just said "time for a vote". He unvotes saying "For the SAK playerslot, I'm hopeful for a replace, because regardless of aignment modkills suck. No point in a wasted vote on him anymore." As a note, SAK was in the lead in votes, as I linked above.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4697293
Wiibox's no lynch triggers several other no lynch votes

Linkz then asks nen why he voted no lynch considering it only takes 50% to lynch.

Nen votes noc, Linkz votes noc.

What I found interesting about this lead was that at one point SAK was in the lead. Who knows why votes didn't continue, but I'm leaning that it was because a replacement would be looked for. I also found it interesting that both linkz and pezus said that Radish's bingo theory was denounced by both linkz and pezus. Other than that, nothing much here. I got the impression that the way the votes played it, it seemed like Linkz was all too happy to talk his vote off of SAK, and near the end decided to go after noc.

Further, I also remember that Linkz is almost always for lynching, yet day 1 he didn't really make a concerted effort, despite that near the beginning of day 2 he said I was a big suspect from process of elimination, yet never went after me day 1. I would hope that using process of elimination, he'd have more than just me in the suspect list as likely mafia, but he never really pushes for anyone day 1, and appeared to give up on noc day 2 (albeit, he admitted that noc was never a big suspect for him).

Wow, this is still going on?!
I knew I wouldn't be able to play it.

Yeah thanks for noticing this. Linkz, please answer how my claim was bullshit mafia claim. You said "when j0 is enforcing 50% voting lynch". In actuality, it allows for town to be 3Mafia v 4Town with a voteless, and still lynch a mafia.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4705815

Nen then parrots Linkz without realizing that technically town is not handicapped at all with my voteless (especially considering that in a game of 14, town likely has an extra player, so for balance voteless makes sense)

Pezus and Mario also make points regarding voteless. Mario says "prove it" essentially, and pezus says "prof, what do you think about what linkz said about voteless being particularly unbalanced".

I already answered that. My character is a monk.

Yeah, it seems that mafia could be possessed items rather than humans.

My hidden question here is, if mafia talked about the "humans vs ghosts", how would they frame the conversation, knowing that some of them were inanimate objects? Also, how would they react? Pretend they don't know about inanimate objects? Would mafia say definitely that humans were town and mafia were ghosts, trying to make it seem like they have no indication that there is an inanimate object player? What I mean is, would they try to make a townie think "he can't be mafia because he thought the mafia were ghosts possessing humans".

DId anyone point out that ghosts could possess objects, like in the OP?

I believe that
Day ends in 5 1/2 hours
prof is at L-2
Stefl is at L-3

but official votals etc. would be nice.

You guys voting prof: I'm not saying I completely trust him, not even close, but Stefl is so inactive -- are you SO confident prof is scum that you'd rather lynch him than someone who's posted so little that he's almost not even playing the game?

After Prof's more recent posts I am more inclined to believe his claim. A Monk would make sense as being someone who couldn't vote since they usually don't speak and the 50% vote rule actually goes along with a voteless player, like Baalz pointed out.

I don't want to end the day in another no lynch, but that might be better that getting a townie lynched. At any rate, it doesn't look like Stefl is ever going to post too much and he is usually mafia when he is actively lurking. He might be our best shot, imo. Also, I know I am jumping all over the place...

unvote: Prof

vote: Stefl

If there is one mafia and one townie left... Was that a serious question?

The day does indeed end in 5 hours.